FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH

ON THE 39 ARTICLES

 

CHAPTER TWO

Of the Word or Son of God which was made very Man.

 

We have seen in the Article One how the “Anglican divines” were, are still?, masters in hiding the point; but forced to be original they had to empty the Dogma of His Historical and Personal Value, degrading the Intellectual Greatness of the Fathers of the Church down to a mere extractive capacity.

Failing to explain how was it that the Jews could not made this extraction, they avoid the question coming out of their Article : God has no Body, God has no Passion, God has no Parts, and close the road to a future talk with the Catholic Church, rising Death Penalty Sentence upon any English daring to take the mask off from the face of their divines.

However, the Kingdom of the Alfreds and the Williamses and the Richards suffered a Reign of Terror from Henry to Elizabeth equal to the Reign of Terror which the Jews suffered under the Hasmonean and the Two Herods, father and son; when the Lord came around all the good men were in Heaven, all the cowards and murderers had invaded the entire structure of the national power. This was the historical background which made possible the publishing of these articles. Unworthy men, who escaped the Reign of Terror by kneeling before the Tyrant and his House, and here is good to remember the saying of the good men, “he who does not know how to die, he deserves not to live”, those kind of men were the men who signed these Articles, men who had not Religion in their head, but Politics. And as such they were unworthy of the Spirit of the one on whom they said :

 

The Son, which is the Word of the Father, begotten from everlasting of the Father, the very and eternal God, and of one substance with the Father, took man’s nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin, of her substance : so that two whole and perfect natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined together in one Person, never to be divided, whereof is one Christ, very God and very man; who truly suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried, to reconcile His Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also all actual sins of men.

 

Most probably the citizens of the Fortunate Islands had never ever heard this childish statement. Most probably the Anglican Divines had this Revelation suddenly, our of the blue and into the green, so to speak. Most certainly the English rained their blood over Europe to conquer the Land of the Future, a Land, by the time this article for children came about, had been already into a Tree of Nations. And the English common, in their misery, poverty and ignorance, after having being massacred by Henry, by Mary, by Edward, and then by Elizabeth, was left no choice but to kneel or to perish.

This statement was never heard in the lands of the Europeans from the South. Nop! This statement was revealed to the Teuton Race in the Fifteenth Century, and the Teuton Race had bought for the Christ and God, with their blood, the Roman Empire call on the to testify, a World, call it Europe! Where were the English and the Germans, and the Danes, and the Swedes and the Norwegians, while the Italians the French and the Spanish were feeding the lands with their blood, to give to Europe a Future and to the World a Civilization?

Yet it is most conspicuous nature of the Politian Man to rob to the worker his salary and take from his immediate predecessors the glory due to his hard labors. There was very little Religion in the Reformation and a lot of Politics.

It is from the very Ancient History known that the climax of the kings and queens of the world is obtained by their acclamation as gods of the people. The intimate connection between this constant deification of the queens and kings of the ancient gave birth to a mythology in which gods and men were so intermixed as to, as time passed by, not to know who was who. In the case of the Anglican Kings and Queen this retrogression to that very Far Past, later on recovered by the Mad Caesars, was propitiated by the “divines reformers”. There was a huge property to be divided between the English aristocracy. There was a huge property to be divided between the German Princes. Politics, no Religion, was the root of the Reformation. And this is shown in the very first paragraph of this Second Article :

The Son, which is the Word of the Father, begotten from everlasting of the Father, the very and eternal God, and of one substance with the Father, took man’s nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin, of her substance…

I mean, where is the fuss? What is the news?

They take the Dogma of the Catholic Church to rise Death Penalty Sentence against the Catholics?

By this Declaration the Anglican is as Catholic Man. Thence, why he does not call on his own head the death for High Treason against the English Crown?

But being the King of England, or the Queen, the head of the Church, it is given from this reading that the entire Anglican Church, when writing this Article, put herself on High Treason Penalty against the Crown of Earth. If the Anglican Church wasn’t, then the Crown was committing High Treason against the Crown of Heaven. The Son was and is the King, the Universal King, the Only King of the Creation of His Father. By this Article the Church of England recognizes the Divine Nature of the Son but Deny to the Father the Power to give the Crown of the English to the Son. This was, as a matter of fact, the Nature of the Rebellion of the Devil and the Fallen Angels. They rose against the Law by which all the Crowns of the Universe had to be put at the Feet of the Throne of the Son.

Even so, admitting Ignorance in the English Reformation, Ignorance clearly seen in the Coronation of Charlemagne, Ignorance by which it is confirmed the conclusion written in the First Chapter, this is to say, that the Bible, the Scriptures alone, cannot save the man, but without the Bible cannot be saved neither, the Church and the Bible One Single Reality made Flesh, the Catholic Church. Admitting the Ignorance of the Christian World as a reality established on Facts, the Division of the Churches one Fact among the many, even so the statement of this Second Article shows no religious spirit, but political spirit.

Of course, we cannot blame religious men for being cowards before a sentence of Death written on them by the political body, the Queen at the top, all of them with their hands full of blood, those good old days of the Free Robbery of the Property of the Catholic Church and the Orders executed in the days of Henry, and so forth, were not far back. Wolves had attacked the shepherds and divided the flock among them. Now, what? Sign, gentlemen!

1 .-The Son which is the Word of the Father…

What is this? You don’t have to be a “divine Anglican” to see the Devil behind this line. Man, you got to be a perfect idiot. The Son is the Word of the Father? What else? The Son is not His Child? His Love? His Life?

The Son is the Word of the Father!

For example, “mark my word”, we say, right? The meaning of this the Son is the Word of the Father can be that when God speaks “He loose the dog”, his Son?

Attack, boy, attack!

I mean, we have here, because disentangled from its Historical and Religious Context, a line which makes no sense at all. “The Son is the word of the Father”. Wow man, you got to be a genius to see a meaning in this sentence, or being exposed to a death sentence if you dare to say a “word”.

Every time God utters a word …. What happen with God, He has no Mouth of His own, or He sees us all unworthy of speaking to us?

But boy, are we not sons of God? What more a natural thing that a father speaking to his sons?

According to this Second Declaration of the “Anglican divines” God does not speak to his sons “face to face”. Unfortunately we have in the Scriptures many declarations saying the contrary, that God speaks to face to face.

Because God does so, speak face to face to His sons, and even to His Friends, God commits High Treason against the Crown of England. God denies the declaration of this Second Article.

What will it be, people of the United Kingdom : The Crown of Heaven or the Crown of Earth?

However, taking this Declaration back and from the Catholic Church Doctrine, we understand that the Son was the God who said “Let there be Light”, and so forth, and according to this Revelation said Saint John : “The Word became Flesh”.

This Article mold into a political situation, detached from Religion, and only religious in the way the Pagan Religions served the Ancient States, this Article is a fraud.

Incapable to Understand the Dogma of the Catholic Church, given by the Saint Spirit, and forced to abandon the Way of Christ, “Church and State live apart”, and only in Him to find the Divine Head, the “anglican divines” copied a Catholic Declaration to cover up the Fact : and the Fact is that they were condemning the Catholic Church because a bunch of bad Christians, and doing so they were condemning God for having chosen Peter to be the Chief of the Body of the Bishops. The Chief, never the Head! The Head of the Bishops is Christ Jesus.

2.-… begotten from everlasting of the Father …

Here we go again. Begotten? But we thought that the Reformation was made to correct the error of the Catholic Church.

I am begotten, you are begotten, he is begotten, we are begotten, are you begotten, I don’t know.

Begotten is the action by which the “son of God” is engendered in us.

Not to call “uncreated” the Son was the error of the Catholic Church in the Council of Nicaea. An error against which Saint Athanasius fought to the death, but which was not introduced in the Nicene Creed in the name of the Empire. The raging context between Arians and Catholics was threatening the Unity of the Empire. Constantine was a political man. “Begotten”, “uncreated”, what’s the difference? The Empire will not fall in a civil war because a semantic dispute between religious fellows. This was the position of Constantine. Because “begotten” implied a material substratum the Arians were happy with this particle. Saint Athanasius got angry. The particle due to the Creed was and is “UNCREATED”. And because this Athanasius suffered exile after exile, until, his Creed was recognized.

However the Nicene Creed had the seal of the Emperor, and the Athanasian Creed passed to the realm of the Theology. When the Catholic Church said “begotten” She meant “uncreated”; when the Arians said “begotten” they meant “created”.

Now then, what they mean the “Anglican divines” to be the Son : “Begotten” as the Arians, or “Uncreated” as the Catholics?

It is more than evident, to me and to anybody who love Intelligence over all, that if the Reformers came about to correct the errors of the Catholics their first deed should have been to denounce the political aspect of the Nicene Creed and oblige the Catholic Church to change the Statement and write “uncreated” when is read “engendered” or “begotten”.

Someone may think that the English means “Uncreated” when they read “Begotten”. But this is false. In the Dictionary of the English “Beget” means “create, bear”. And this is precisely the Creed of the Arians : “The son was, is, begotten, not uncreated”. This difference marked the origin of the Controversy and the following Massacres, due to the natural enmity between Christ and the Devil. It was this enmity which was retaken by this Article, when calling the Son “begotten” the Political Body of the Kingdom pushed the English Nation to the side of the Arians, this is to say, to the side of the Devil.

Again, we must repeat that the Sword was kissing the necks of the religious English body and not to sign this Article meant High Treason against the Crown. Hence they adopted the semantic position of Constantine. Today the religious body of the English nation has to open the mouth and say where they stand.

3.- …. the very and eternal God, and of one substance with the Father…

This is another joke. God can be created? How could the Son be begotten and at the same time of one substance with the Father?

If God is the very and eternal God, meaning that Eternity and Infinity had known no Other God, on which subject the very and eternal God, speaks clearly in the Scripture, how can be God, who is Uncreated, create a God of one substance with the Father?

This is just another proof that the Anglican Religion was not founded on Freedom but on Terror. The Conclusion of the Antichristian conjugation of these both statement, “Begotten” and “of the same substance of the Father”, is so evident a resurrection of the Arianism, than only by the Force coming from a tyrannical Political Body, whose Reign of Terror had filled one entire century, could be accepted as Christian. The sole idea of criticizing, exposed to High Treason against the Crown, blinded the Reason of the religious Body of the Kingdom and subjected the English common to a Church composed of Cowards who hid their hearts and souls after the mask of being the Anglican Church nothing else but the Reformed Catholic Church.

4.- … took man’s nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin, of her substance…

Really? So, after all, God was made to the image of men!

I read, correct me please, that God made Man to His Image. Would not be better to say that Man, finally, took the Nature of God?

Man was created to be family of God, a son of God. Man fell and became worse than a beast. How could the Son take man’s nature?

Was not the Reformation made to correct the errors of the Catholic Church? Why then come to reproduce letter by letter the errors introduced into the Catholic Creed by the Roman Church?

Man took God’s Nature! But God said, talking of His Messiah : “God with us”.

Do I have to say what kind of nonsense will be this “God with us” if God was referring to Himself?

“God with us”. Man had being raised, finally, to the Image of God.

Even so, “To the Image of God”, not to “the Nature of God” speaking on Uncreation. And Yes, speaking on to the Indestructible Nature of God. Ergo the Resurrection.

God did not take man’s nature, but became Man to rise the nature of Man to the Nature of God. This is the Divine Doctrine of that Saint Spirit who came down from Heaven to Earth and filled the hearts and the souls of the Apostles, Founders of the Catholic Church with wisdom and Power.

This we know for sure, that the Apostles, in the Unity of the Son and the Father, were the Founders of the Catholic Mother Church, in which the Roman Church, as national church, introduced the errors of the Italian wacky intellect. Who were the Founders of the Anglican Church : A Tyrant, a monster, Henry the Eight; a Whore, Elizabeth the First? This we know, that the Founders did not call on Terror to build the Catholic Church; this we know, that Terror was the womb of the Anglican Church. Let’s keep on walking.

5.- : so that two whole and perfect natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined together in one Person…

What were they talking about? The Father, the Godhead, became man? Just a line before they said that the Son became man. We know, because the Catholic Church’s Saint Spirit taught us so, that the Father is the Godhead, the Father is the Head of Christ, and the Son, the head of the Church.

“The Godhead and Man were joined in one Person?” The Father, then, was the One who came down from Heaven and into the womb of the Virgin? The Father and the Man became One Person? This is what they mean to say? Or this Article was written to proclaim the Divinization of the head of the Church of England?

But this is the antagonist position of the Roman Church. The Italian Intellect worked out the Mystery of the Incarnation this way : Christ is God, Christ is the Head of the Church, we are the Church, we are God : The Holy Father , His Divinity the Roman Pope. The Devil used this Roman way of thinking to cause Europe to vomit such a Logic.

The English extended and appropriated for themselves the Roman Logic, this way : the Head of the Church is God : The King is the Head of the Church : the King (Queen) is God. Anybody rising any objection against this Logic committed High Treason against the God-King-Queen of the English.

We see then that this Articles falls in one error after the other. The Godhead and Manhood, implying that the Godhead became man, as the immediate paragraph which preceded instated, is false. The Son and Man became One Person, Christ, and it is in this Jesus where we find our Godhead. Not in vain God put at the feet of His Son the entire Creation, as is written in the Psalms.

I understand, the Pride of the Teuton Race cannot accept but a relation direct and straight with God Himself, an intermediary Being is a big offense to a Superior Race. Consequently the Teuton Race had to destroy the Church in order to open a straight line of contact with the Godhead.

However, as Baptism cannot be imparted but by the Catholic Church and Baptism is the Door to Heaven, the rejection of the Catholic Church means the rejection of the Creation of God, a Creation not even by the Son rejected after His Resurrections, though great cause He had to do so given the behavior of Peter during His Passion.

My advice? Run for your soul, find a Catholic Priest, ask him to baptize you there and then, immediately, without more preambles. Children need catechesis, indeed, grown men and women knows what they ask and why. So be it.

6.- never to be divided, whereof is one Christ, very God and very man…

Again and again we detect the null presence of a religious mind behind this article. “Very man”? In which way? The way of the men or the way of God’s Man?

For all we know Man was created to reach the Image of God.

A joke from these English divines “Never to be divided”! And what were they doing? Uniting the Christian Nations? Or did they mean that when God said “Let’s make Man to our Image” He meant to make to His Image one and only one man, and because His failure to do so, raise one, just one man to His Image, He had to send His own Son to proof Himself right, this is to say : that He can make a creature to His Image?

If so, we understand, God made it, tricky though, He meant not that all men got to be God’s Image; He proved Himself right, though using a trick, the sending of His Son, and left us all free to do as we please. Because :

And 7.- …who truly suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried, to reconcile His Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also all actual sins of men.

In other words, in Martin Luther’s words : Sin, sin, sin, till the sin fill your heart and your soul, your pockets and your mouth; sin, sin, sin, the more the better, because the blood of Crist cleanse even the rape of the Mother of God.

The Devil could not be more proud of himself after having written this last piece of the Article : but also all actual sins of men. Thus, once the Baptism clean our sins, we can keep on playing the game of sin, the Blood of Christ will clean every sin we will engage in all along through our lives. Once reconciled with the Father, the Law of Christ is dead letter, and the Freedom of the sons of God is related to all actual sins of men, because the Son has won for us the Love of the Father and no sin sin sin can break the bond that Christ made between us and the Godhead with His blood.

Indeed, no crime however big broke never ever the bond between the Godhead of the Anglican church and its body. And will never be. As their God, their Image.

But the more funny part is this last paragraph is “to reconcile His Father to us”. I mean, God was in trouble, right? God had a lot to fear from us. As a matter of fact, reading this sentence one is tempted to think what in the first article was said : “God has no Parts”, and because He was shaking from fear of men His Son has to calm Him down and prove Him that “us” we are not so bad.

The Devil had so much fun. Not only the Teuton Race rejected the Creation of God, the Catholic Christian Church, because the denials of the Italian Roman Church, they did more, they laughed in the face of the Godhead, “Come on, She was just a bitch, who need a wife, the Lord need no wife, don’t be so touchy, why you want a Woman when you can have so many men? And if you really mean to give a Wife to the Lord, hey Godhead, take this, a real Whore, the Queen of the English. Hey man”

Again, run for your soul, boy, grasp a catholic priest by the arm, “Baptize me, father, now, here”. Just say it : “I Believe in the Uncreated son of the Uncreated God”. And welcome to the Church, welcome to Paradise.

And here it goes the reinvention of themselves constantly made by the “anglican divines” in order to hide the real substratum which served as matter for the conception of a Church created not by God but by men.

As the Anglican church grew and her priests have to reconcile their first creed with the level of knowledge on the Christian Mystery that the Continental Churches enjoyed ever since the Apostles, they readapted the meaning of the articles, as you will see in a second. To end up defaming the Catholic Church with Negation of the Incarnation. Can you believe this? The author says that the Catholics deny the Incantation when adoring the Heart of Jesus, because adoring the Heart is worshipping a human thing, and as worship is due to God, then, ergo, vomitam vomitandis, the Catholics, the Founders and Inventors of the Dogma of the Incarnation : They, us, , I, we deny the Incarnation.

What a crap!

English, run for your soul, you were deceived by the Devil.