FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH

ON THE 39 ARTICLES

 

CHAPTER ONE

Of Faith in the Holy Trinity.

 

It is of common sense, a fact, that History is a Book. Why so? For Historians to falsify reality and maintain the people under the yoke? It looks very much like that, indeed.

The reading of the historical background of the Christian churches lies not.

After the harvest of good men by the Tyrant Henry the VIII, the first of the Tudorian House, and the Rebellion of Mary the Bloody, plus the new bloody harvest of good men, those left alive by his predecessors, by Edward’s ordered, the generation which signed these Articles under the Imperial Rule of the Whore Queen, that gang of divines was entire composed of these two kind of personalities abhorred by God the most : cowards and murderers.

This truth, heavy like the entire weight of the universe, we see it operating at full power in the first of the Articles of Religion by the Antichristian Whore Queen of the Anglican Church written. We read :

 

There is but one living and true God, everlasting, without body, parts, or passions; of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness; the Maker and Preserver of all things, both visible and invisible.

And in the unity of this Godhead there be three Persons, of one substance, power, and eternity : the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

 

Can be more ignorance found? God has no “Passions”, God has no “Body”, God has no “Parts”. As a matter of fact the conclusion out of this Dogma cannot be other that God does not exist.

Let’s deal with the obvious:

“God is not the Head of Christ? Christ is not the Head of the Church?” How so? We read : God is the Head of Christ, Christ is the Head of the Church. Even so, the Anglican Gang (or were "divines") wrote : God has no body! (The meaning of the Tudorian Antichrist was to write God is No Body, but the Crown Bride of Satan thought that even a coward when pushed to a certain limit can play the hero). God had no Body! Ergo, the Church is not the Body of Christ, God is not the Body of God. Hence, ladies and gentlemen : The head of the Church can be anybody; it really does not matter if the first head was a serial killer monster, and the successor a Whore Queen of the kind of the Great Russian Empress, Catherine the Bitch. Why not? A head need a body, a body need a head. Why should have the church of England as head that Jew, what was his name, Christ? Who cares, the church of England can only have a English man as head. Christ go home!

Curiously, Saint Paul and with Him the entire Court of the Apostles, said : “God is the Head of Christ, Christ is the Head of the Church”. Ergo the Church is the Body of Christ & Christ the Body of God; hence the Vision of the Godhead. Meaning, the Apostles in perfect and eternal Unity, said “God has a Body”.

Let’s get the bull by the horns. God says “I have a Body, Christ is my Body, Christ is the Head of My Church”. Of course this Meaning takes for granted that the Holy Spirit came down from Heaven and took as His Body the Church, retaining the Holy Spirit, as God, the position of the Head of that Body.

Were the Apostles were drunk, is the big Question. WEREN'T THEY?

Possibly Saint Paul and Saint Peter were eating a baby child, as Romans said they did so, or they were celebrating one of those orgies of which the Divine Queen Whore of the English use to give to her worshippers so many. Am I wrong?

How so?

Let’s speak for real.

When you behead the Body of God, the Church being the Body of Christ, Christ being the Body of God, God being the Head of the Church through and in Christ, and you become the Head of that Beheaded Body of God, hey man, you are God. Ergo, we understand the falling on their knees of the House of the Lords of England in the presence of their God, Henry the Eight.

Again : the Church is the Body of Christ, Christ is the Head of the Church, Christ is the Body of God. You take God's place when becoming the Head of the Church, because the Head of the Church is God : you are God, the God of the English National Church.

Was it not sound this logic of the Antichrist Tyrant Henry the Eighth, the Defendant of the Faith?

Well, who did suspect, let’s give them this, that after a while the Godhead of the Anglican World would be a Goddess.

The Devil really had a lot of fun giving to the English Church by head the Queen of the Whores.

Will I have to get back to the premises? Is still the Anglican Church a body of cowards without that what a Christian man has to have to stand his ground and shout, aloud and proud : My Head if God!?

But… once beheaded, can a body survive?

I guess not. The operation of the Anglican Church renouncing to Christ as Head and taking the Tudor King as the Personification of God was, indeed, a high deed of genetic enginery : cut off the original head and replace it with another, quick, seconds, a marvel, the wonder of the sixteenth century. What a reign of Terror! The Talibans of that day massacring an entire population in the Name of the Holy Ghost!

The theological background which served as Hospital for that big operation of beheading a body and bringing back to from the grave with the head of a king, was a manipulation of the facts. The Bishop of Rome never was and never will be the Head of the Body of Christ. Logic denounces this statement as the greatest stupidity never spoken, written and published.

Of course, only the Germans, masters in defamation and world genocides, superheroes of the Propaganda, could put into the heads of the European Christian nations such a vision of the Pope as head of the Body of Christ.

Idiocy a common factor natural to the families of the Teuton Race, the imposition of this Doctrine of the Devil, Satan's goal to behead the Body of Christ, this Doctrine could not win the day but upon complete massacres on their own people, with which bloody ink the pages of the Book of History is always written, unfortunately.

From sanctity to Devil brotherhood was a very narrow line, and neither Luther nor Henry the VIII did feel mercy for the common when their feet came to the task, equal to it as they were. Remember the so-called the Wars of the Peasants. If you do not know that Luther called on to the destruction of those army of dogs, and that Henry the Eight proceeded according to the same call, my friend, you gotta go back to school. You gotta relearn to read. A man who does not read behind the lines is what I call the perfect idiot. I agree with whomever wants me to agree with that the holy mission of the historians is to wash the crimes of their masters, O Cambridge, live forever! Not long ago the New Russian Czar wrote a Decree rising to High Treason to rewrite the History of Russia. Why so? What has Russia to hide?

The picture don't lie. And the conclusion of this re-reading of the Anglican Creed incarnated in these 39 Articles will be this : Cowards and murderers gathered together in London under the Antichristian Goddess to sign the Final Act of Divinization of the Tudor House. “God has no Body”.

The Whore Queen meant “God is. God has no-Body”, just a question of semantic.

But the parallel text of the Apostles “on the Church and Christ, Christ and God : Body and Head”, blows away from the Intelligence the acceptation of such an Article, and breaks in the deepness of the Text to find in it the Seed of the Devil. And from here we pass to another level.

It is obvious that the Creature, the sons of God, cannot attain Immortality without their Creator. Immortality without God means nothing else but an extension of Mortality.

Creation is based on the Immortality of the Creatures. But this Immortality cannot reach Eternal Life without enjoying the Indestructibility of God. We have here two Natures. God’s Natures : Immortality from Indestructibility, and Creation’s Nature : Immortality from the Creator.

It was obvious to God, as it is obvious to Wisdom, that after having raised the Nature of the Life to Immortality, the Next Step, Indestructibility, could not be attained by the Creator but becoming the Head of the Creation. By this Unity the Nature of the Creator embraces the Nature of the Creation to raise Immortality “from” Creation to Immortality “from” God.

Conclusion, no creature can attained Eternal life but in God, this is to say: Creation and Creator becomes one reality, One Indivisible Fact, Head and Body.

The Victory of God over Death was finally reached. Under this Conclusion of Wisdom, God came down from Heaven to make of the Church His Body, the Body of Christ, the Body of God. Where does the essence of this Article stand now?

But as the final goal of this re-reading the Anglican Creed is to open the eyes and the ears of the English Nation to the fact of the High Treason against the Crown of Heaven by the Anglican Church signed under the pressure of the Tudorian Terror, me leaving to the Mother Church to show mercy and the love of Her Lord and Husband on whom denied to know Christ, remember Peter, let's advance towards the Land of Immortality, our Future Home.

Immortality alone is based on the mastering of the Laws of Matter, Space and Time. It was not long ago (taking Eternity as measure) that God mastered these laws, and pushed Life into the dimension of Immortality. However, Immortality means not Indestructibility, a factor which belongs, exclusively, to God’s Nature.

As God’s Vision of Creation implied Eternal Life in the Unity of Creator and Creation as Head and Body, God engendered a New Creature, Christ, born to live and enjoy God’s Indestructibility. With this Work, Immortality had reached its climax, the Victory of God over Death was sealed.

Now again, “let’s ask to the heirs of those cowards and murderers who kneeled before the Queen of the Britons and worshipped as their Godhead a Whore : ladies and gentlemen “God has no Body?”

Do you mean that Creation can reach Indestructibility without the Creator?

Do you mean than because by Faith’s Immortality you can defy God and reach Indestructibility without God as your Head?

Do you mean that the Indestructibility of the Church of England depends not on God but on your Antichrist Queen?

God has mercy on you, I will say it again : God is the Head of Christ. Christ is the Head of the Church. God is the Head of the Church. Ergo, the Body of God is the Church.

Now, still do you sign the Article of the Antichrist Queen : “God has no Body”?

One more time : The Church is the Body of Christ. God is the Head of Christ. Ergo : God is the Head of the Church.

So, ladies and gentlemen : Wasn’t Elizabeth acting under the Command of Satan when taking away from the Body of the English Church is Divine Head, and rising Herself as Head, this way declaring Herself “God”?

However, God being the Head of the Church, just as the Apostles said, when you give yourselves a human head, whether a tyrant, a whore or a queer, it really does not matter, the properties of the beast is a fact beyond the idiocy of the sealers; while doing so : is the Church of England committed to God, or to the Devil?

It is more than obvious that from the standing point of view of the Devil’s War on Christ, that the policy of the Death’s Prince was to attack the heart of the Catholic Church in order to push the criticizers of the conduct of those days’ bishops of Rome : away from the Covenant by Christ signed with His Blood between God and Man. This I say it not bringing condemnation on the Anglican Church, but in the name of the justification of such a Sin against the Lord by the fathers of the Anglican Church committed, equal, on all extremes, to the Sin of Adam and Eve, and accordingly in need of coming to Repentance and Forgiveness, and back into the Body of Christ, the Catholic Christian Church.

Following Death’s Policy, the Prince of Hell had to kindled the Greed of the Roman Race, under which Vice they sequestered the Wife of Christ, the Servant becoming the Lord of the House in the name of the Invisibility of the Lord. Blinded by the infinite ambition that the Italians had inherited from their imperial ancestors, those who could not see the Lord how would see the Devil?

The Structure of the Devil’s Plot against Christ’s Body was of a very simple nature. Once those Romans, worshippers of empire and gold, had sequestered the Church, the hate caused by the infinite cupidity of the Italian Houses would cause a politico-religious earthquake of tremendous proportions, under which waves the soundness of the mind would be lost, and in the name of the Roman Church’s corruption the Church founded by God Himself would be put in the hands of the Kings and Queens of that wicked Teuton race, good for nothing but to pillaging, massacring and world wars.

One wicked race, the Teuton Tribes, by then Nations, versus a degenerated one, the Italian Families, now Clans, and Clans which dared to sequester the Catholic Church and put on Her account the crimes of the Roman Cardinals.

But beyond this, that the Bishop of Rome never proclaimed Himself the Head of the Body of Christ but the head of that corrupted body of Italian Cardinals, this is a fact not to forget. Policy and Religion hand by hand, the fact was smashed beneath the boots of the Germans.

Would we give up Democracy because a generation of wicked politicians?

Why then, when the nations gave up the Catholic Church because the corruption of the body of the Cardinals?

Obliged to sanctity, Intelligence got to keep clear the mind, he who wants to go to hell, hey man, the doors of hell are open, let him go. The Question is, who wants to go to Hell once known the whole thing?

To conclude with this first paragraph we say the contrary signed in this Article, this is to say : “God has a Body and that Body is the Three of the churches, whose Trunk is the Catholic Church”.

And I conclude this first paragraph saying that the Creator is the Head of the Creation, thus wen saying that God has no Body you say that you are not the Creation of God. Who's your Creator then?

And to sum up this in a physical structure to live forever, the Kingdom of God : The King, Jesus Christ, is the Head of the Church, through whom Faith show us the Way to Eternal Life : “Indestructibility in His Divinity our Home”.

This settled, let’s pass to the second statement : “God has no Passion”

 

2

How so? Christ did not die? The Evangelist invented the “Passion” of Christ? Or the real meaning of the statement was, and is, that Christ and God are not One reality?

If there was Passion of Christ, there was Passion of God, isn’t, fellows?

Then, when you deny Passion in God, you deny the Unity of Christ and God. Am I right or wrong? After all you are the “divines”, and me just another common with an uncommon head, “Christ”.

Of course, they worshippers of the Goddess Whore, and because Whore head of the Anglican Church, or she became heads of the Anglican Church because she was a Goddess?; those “divines” weren’t speaking of the Passion of Christ. They were “divines”, and had Saint Tomas in the head. Which lead us to say : O man, with Theology we have come to deal.

Thanks God am not a theologian, I will cut short the deal.

Creation is not a Passion?

Are we or aren’t we created to the Image of our Creator?

Are not our fellows appassionato creators women and men who live and die for “passion”?

“Creation is not a Passion”.

This is what those fellows divines meant?

I don’t think that they really meant this, neither I think they knew what they meant.

Their Tyrant Whore put her Creed on the table, they knew that their head was hanging on the wall, if they wanted to live they should better sign that Contract with the Devil, her Reward was the Empire.

They weren’t superheroes, I understand, not everybody had the soul of a More, a true man, a real English man, when there were English in Paradise Island, in the days of old, the days before the Teuton Race came and burnt the Anglo Stock to the bones, ashes to ashes, come on, sing the song.

“Creation is not a Passion”, they said, they still confess?

Hello, some hundred years after, let’s ask it again : “Is it Creation a Passion?”

Of course, I know, to deny this fact, “Creation is Passion”, you have to deny the existence of the Universe as a Creation of God. Creation does not exist, ergo, God has no Passion. What a wit! One progresses going ahead, others walking backwards.

Being Creation a Passion, as many geniuses around the world can tell, I ask: Is it there any Creation higher than the Creation of the Universe? What would the Anglican Church call the Creation of the Universe? A killing time crosswords?

Let’s walk a little bit further : God has “no Passion” for Justice?

Why then He bothered Himself with the murder of Adam?

After all God has the Power of rising the dead. God has no “No passion” for Justice, call Adam back to life, God!

If Passion for Justice He has not, why then His swearing on His Name and Head that Adam's Murderer would pay in Hell his deed?

God has “no Passion” for Justice!?

God has “no Passion” for Creation!?

According to this, Christ was the biggest fool ever born on Earth.

According to this Article God is an idol of letters sitting on a throne of words, watching the river flow, and ... we love you yeah yeah yeah .. while you don’t fucking move.

Made to His image, Passion is, according to this Article, a seed of the Devil. And all of us who are attacked by the seed of the Devil, Passion for Justice, for Art, for Books, for Music, Painting, Architecture, Science, Children, Women, and Men, we are the children of the Devil.

Obladi oblada, yellow submarine, yellow submarine, God save the Queen!

 

3

Here we come, the supreme statement ever : “God has no parts”.

Yeah bro, “God has no parts”.

I don’t know in the English Language, but in the Spanish Language when we say that of someone : “he has no parts”, we mean : “he has not bollocks”

Well, made to the Image of God, those who signed this third paragraph knew what they were talking about, they had “no parts”! Even so they were divines!

How can God has “parts”?!

I mean, what on earth were they talking about?

OK, we understand, the axe was swinging from the ceiling, their necks were a thing rope, one single word offending their Goddess and, bye bye, it’s an America pie. Who wants to live forever? Don’t have to, but at least some years, right? Anything else? O yeah, on your knees, kiss my ass!

“God has no parts”.

God has no eyes?

If God has no parts, no eyes, no ears, no mouth, who said 'Let there be the Light', and so on?

He breathed on Man and Man was made. But if he had no nose, “no parts”, who breathed on Man the Desire for Eternal Life?

“God has no parts”. God has no Body, God has no Head. Ergo : Christ is not the head of the Church, the Church is not the Body of Christ. Christ is not the Body of God, God is not the head of Christ.

Bravo for the Antichrist. After all everybody got a body, why the Antichrist could not have a body of his own?

From the moment that God became the head of Christ, and Christ the head of the Church, God has parts. This on the holy way. On the other, that God has no bollocks, “no parts”, well, the signers of this Article were talking about themselves, weren't they?

 

4

The Devil is the Devil because he plays the Snake so well! To hide his Doctrine behind the Gospel, he said : “And in the unity of this Godhead there be three Persons, of one substance, power, and eternity : the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost”. Which is to say absolutely nothing. Or something else. Whatever, it was the mask behind which to hide the Doctrine of the Negation of Christ as Head of the Church. This way of sounding so perfectly orthodox hid from the eyes of the Britons the real face of the Reformation began by the First of the Antichrist of the House of the Tudors.

 

And 5

The defense of the Anglican divines along the centuries can be centered in the author of the next lines. As we read on we see, first : He will never touch the Question of God as the Head of Christ, and the Church as the Body of Christ. Not at all. The author wastes all of his time trying to demonstrate that the Christian need not Church, by no means, the Bible alone is enough to be the basis of the Faith.

Trying harder as men do when they want to blow off the truth, he arrives to the point to deny the entire New Testament when asserting that in the Old Testament the Doctrine of the Trinity is contained in full, and the existence of the Uncreated Son of God already given. But we know that the enmity to death from the Jews to Jesus was based in the ignorance of the Existence of this Uncreated Son, on whom no news is given in the Old Testament, not at all. When Jesus came the Jews were pushed into the blue. The New testament filled this gap and show us the existence of the Uncreated Son of God, not as a theory or one certain hypothesis to be considered, but as a Fact, a reality.

Again, the New Testament speaks not of the Holy Spirit as in the Catholic Trinity is done.

The Church, hence, was the suite, in flesh and bones, not in letter, of God’s Revelations in course, not finished, by this time to continue not through words but through Living men.

The Mystery of the Trinity enunciated in this Article cannot be proved on the Bible alone because the Bible and the Church became one reality, and God continued to reveal Himself to Mankind through His Church. The Trinity is the revelation of God to Mankind through the Catholic Church, directly, a Revelation, indeed, which without the Bible could haven’t been done. Thence, when the Christians Churches rejected and rejects the Catholic Christian Church, the Bishop of Rome the Chief of the Universal College of Bishops, they reject the Creation of God, a sin so terrible that not even the Uncreated Son, after coming from the death, dared to deny, insomuch as Peter had denied Him three times.

However, these reformers called “divines” themselves because they have taken Theology to the point of converting the water into wine, water being the truth and wine the lie.

The Bible is the work of God, His Book, and He gave His Book to the Wife of His Son, the Catholic Church as Property, and the necessary basis for the understanding of the Divinity of the Holy Spirit and the Unity of the Father and the Son in this Spirit, and in this Spirit is realized the Union of Creation and Creator in one Eternal and Indestructible Reality, God the Head, Christ His body, and in Christ the entire Kingdom of God abides

Trying to understand without the Church the Mystery to the Church revealed by the Saint Spirit and from Her given to the Christian World, the author falls straight in the heresiarchism of the first days when he says : “Therefore we must conclude, that Christ is Jehovah”. Divine as he was, and free from error, because God had rejected the Wife of His Son and give Him a new Wife, a Whore Queen, he was incapable to understand the Unity referred in the Mystery, which is called Dogma because its complexity, and believing himself superior to the fathers of the Church, he concluded that Christ is Jehovah, this is to say, that The Son is the Father, and the Father is the Son, and Both the Saint Spirit. Amen.