FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH

ON THE 39 ARTICLES

 

CHAPTER SIXTEEN

Of Sin after Baptism.

 

In this Question the most important thing is to define “What is Sin?”. Until this Question is not  answered we are subjected to many different degrees of manipulation. Basing on this non-definition of the term every church can build a doctrine of her own according the need of the times.

The “Anglican divine” loses no time in calling to the stage the whole team of dead men, to end his journey to Graveyard Land and back saying nothing on what Sin is.

For a Soul whose Life is based on the Rock of Truth, Truth related to Intelligence, not to Power, least of all to the rule of a Tyrant, and in order to  begin to walk this journey through Life, the eyes set in a World made not by the hands of men, but by the Hands of God, which is the Heart of the Christian Faith, the Soul got to get free from the doctrines of men and without rejecting their principles subject every one of them to the power of his Thought. How could I accept as Sin anything in the heat of the moment decreed by a bishop, a king or a theologian? Am I a fool? Before to accept any principle I got to understand what Sin is.

What is Sin?

I guess  Sin is what the most clever fellow around, with a sufficient back-up power, says. All right.

But this says nothing to me. No one is going to open for me the Door to Paradise, absolutely no one.. but the One whom to Paradise belong. Is there anybody who can say : Paradise is mine?

Yes we hear the voices of mad tyrants saying : “Zimbawe is mine”; so England belong to the Queen; Germany to the New Reich on Power, Russia to Putin. And so on and so forth. So what?

They are shadows on the wall, ghosts with a life burning under desires born in Hell Land. The freedom to kill is there, the right to Self-defense, too. Some have already make of this right to self-defense a crime. Syrian Population is under state of genocide with the blessing of Russia and China. On the other hand the law of America says that the Rebellion against a Tyrant is legitimate, good and necessary.

We see from here that if in things appertaining to the mortal things, which vanishes like shadows beneath the sun, men’s intelligence is equal to a wild animal’s, in things appertaining to the Soul I got to give it a heavy thought to the subject in Question : What Sin is.

But to settle the question on Christian basis let’s begin where everything did begin. Did Jesus or did not abrogated Moses’s Law as Judicial Law?

No one go to jail because he dishonors his father and mother. No one goes to jail for adultery. No one goes to jail because he worships a monster. Of these kind were the Laws of Moses.

Under Moses’s Law Christ had to die, and He had to die because He came to separate Moses’s Laws from Civil Justice.

Jesus’s Revolution in the realm of the Jewish State, was simple : Separation of State and Religion.

The fusion of State and Religion, Religion ruling the State, (State running Religion, case of the Anglican Temple is another matter), led the Kingdom of Israel to its total destruction. With or without Jesus the Nation was walking the path of its destruction. Jesus had nothing to do with it. Israel was waiting better times, a sign from Heaven, a new Roman Civil War, to rise in Rebellion and fight for Independence and Country. Jesus, as was natural to His Divine Nature, saw the Fall of the Roman Empire and took measures to enforce the Resurrection of the Civilization. The Jesuchristian Separation of State and Temple could not be done but by the Conversion of Religion to His Faith. And so it was done.

The Religious conception on Sin was separated from the Civil Justice. Consequently the Law of Moses was abrogated. The Penal Law natural to the Law of Moses was alienated from the Civil Justice, by it the religion of the Jews becoming a religion of the Old World, leveled with the Old religions of the Ancient nations, such as Buddism, Zoroastrism, Paganism, and so on so forth. And with the Birth of the Catholic Christianity a New Conception on what Sin is came upon the scene.

To kill is a crime, not a sin. To rob is not a sin, but a crime. To desire another’s man woman is a sin, not a crime. To curse is not a crime, but a sin.

However, Jesus said that He came not to abrogate the Law of Moses. He meant with this that to separate Sin and Civil Justice implies not to abolish the effect of the sin on the human soul. The Law was brought to make the “sin” abundant, and by its existence to become a subject of our study.

Sin is the cause of a certain effect. If I drink I get drunk. If I drive drunk blind I can get hurt.

Sin is the beginning of a chain reaction. Once you begin to dishonor your father and your mother, to desire other’s men women, to lie in order to conquer, and so on and so forth, you become a slave of the power of Death. The natural effect of this chain reaction is to reject God, His Creation, His Moral and His Ethics. You begin to walk the Path that once a son of God took.

But the Law of Freedom is there. This is not to deny. You can do anything. You got to accept the consequences too.

Notwithstanding these are nickels and dimes. Sin is the Rebellion, taken on Full Conscience, against the Law of the Holy Spirit. This was the Sin of Satan, once a son of God, and this is the Sin talking about which the Son of God said that “Sin against the Holy Spirit is unpardonable”.

How could we Sin?

Christ being Immaculate, and while living in His Spirit, how can we Sin?

We can’t. The entire speech of the Anglican Church and the Reformation on Sin after the Baptism is a bread from the Devil to feed the Antichristian Division of the Churches.

Have the Anglican Church committed SIN?

How could She? The Law of the Ignorance was acting. Faith was the Hope on a Future Day when Men would come to the Glory of the Freedom of the sons of God. A Day in which the Father of Mankind will keep His Omniscience away no more from the Future of the World.

Were the Nations freed from this Ignorance in the days of the Reformation?

Not at all! Luther, Calvin, Henry VIII, the Borgias, all were subjected to the same Law. All had to live by their Faith, but Ignorance was there to corrupt their Faith.

Can the Anglican Church “SIN”?

Of course, She has only to reject this Day’s Unification Will of God. This will mean open Rebellion against the Will of God, and the Law of the Holy Spirit. The reward would be Hell.

And this applies for all the churches.

But let’s stick now to the Article.

 

 

Not every deadly sin willingly committed after baptism is sin against the Holy Ghost, and unpardonable. Wherefore the grant of repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sin after baptism. After we have received the Holy Ghost we may depart from grace given and fall into sin, and by the grace of God we may arise again and amend our lives. And therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sin as long as they live here, or deny the place of forgiveness to such as truly repent.

 

The malignant structure of this article is clear : “Not every deadly sin willingly committed after baptism”.

The Jesuchristian Salvation is based on the Ignorance of man. It was because God found Ignorance in his son, Adam, that redemption was promised; it was because “a deadly sin willingly committed” the murderer, another son of God, Satan’s Sin, was unpardonable.

It is this WILLINGLY that marks the difference between Christ and the Devil. That every single son of God, of this Earth, finds himself stranded between Mortality and Immortality, how can be denied? That the World we have Inside and the world as there is Outside is on perpetual War, only a fool will deny. As I said yesterday, who expect to find t the face of the warrior just coming out of a bloody battle shiny like the face of a mother of pearls? Are you out of your mind?

We live in a world flashing temptations of every kind at the speed of light, we live driving between them the best we can. Sometimes we get hurt, sometime we hurt somebody. The difference between the World before Christianity and the World after turns to this point : Men before Christ did not care about the hurting they did; we do.

Do we depart from Grace because we have to learn to live in a world continuously showing its back to all what we love?

Of course not. We only depart from Grace when we do  Evil “WILLINGLY”.

The Article says that even done WILLINGLY not every Willingly Deadly Deed (SIN) is unpardonable. But the Article does not say which Willingly Deadly Deed is pardonable neither. It would be wonderful to be informed of the entire scale of deadly Sins by the Anglican Divines imposed upon the Universal Judge of Mankind.

Of course to stare at a girl with profligate eyes is not a crime, but it leads to crime. Ask to the millions of girls raped in the Muslin World and in India. The Law of Freedom is given to attack the last criminal effect of the desires of the Flesh by the world fed. The Modern Psychiatry will tell us that this Jesuchristian Deed of Perfection by which we fight back crime attacking the evil to the root in us, it is a repression of our instincts. They are very welcome in the World were girls are raped by the thousand every day.

Turning to the Article, “After we have received the Holy Ghost we may depart from grace given and fall into sin”, we see the Puritanistic fundamentalism note in this Article as repugnant to the “holy Ghost”. God can fall? Christ can Fall?

Of course, if you have not a clue what Sin is before the eyes of God, of course you can fall. Because I am driven mad by a world ruled by madness, I fall?

I fall and only I commit Sin only when I rise against God, WILLINGLY, imitating the Devil, to repudiate God’s Law on Truth, Peace and Justice.

But why should I do this? Am I mad? The Holy Spirit Words were clear : If you Sin you are not of Christ.

How can you be a Christian and sin? But if you sin you are not of Christ, but of the Devil, because to Sin is to rise against the Law of the Holy Ghost.

Faults, sins according to the Law of Moses, hey man, I lost the count. About this said the Apostle that if we say we don’t sin, we are liars.

“And therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sin as long as they live here...”.

And not only here. By the Spirit we have been born in, we will Sin not here not in Eternity. The way from here to eternity is a long and narrow road, sometime anger, sometimes frustration, sometimes treason, sometimes, desperation, sometimes… These facts have nothing to do with our Spirit; we are born in the Spirit not as a guest in the house of a stranger, in any moment ready to leave. The Spirit and us, we are one.

Do you receive the Spirit? But have not heard “that you have to be born from the Spirit?”

It is my soul not mine? How could me and my Spirit be two things apart? Now you have, now you don’t have it!

“ …or deny the place of forgiveness to such as truly repent”.

And as always, when did the Catholic Church deny forgiveness to the “sinner” according to the Commandment laws? It is all the contrary, I dare to say, and because the Roman Church made of Forgiveness a Market, where even the Violation of the Mother of God could be pardoned, in Luther’s Word, the “sin” became so abundant as to allow the Devil to harvest the fruit of its labor : The Division of the Churches.

Concluding remarks :

By Baptism we were born to Eternity in the Spirit of Love to the Law of the Holy Ghost;

We cannot Sin;

We will never Sin;

We will live forever and ever by the Jesuchristian Law.

There is not such a space to a Possible Future Fall in us.

We conceive not that space in us and we will not give in us space to such a Sin : the Sin of Rebellion against the Word of God.

This is the Sin that is unpardonable.

The rest, those sins whose effect is death of the Faith, are left to our Freedom, in the knowledge that once in the Power of Death the Fall from Faith has no returning way. Forgiveness for all those sins are Mother Church Matter, and as to the Mother belong the things of the House of Her Lord and Father of Her son, I said what I said, and will say no more, but this : "He who is free from sin, let him throw the first stone".