FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH

ON THE 39 ARTICLES

 

CHAPTER FIFTEEN.

Of Christ alone without Sin.

 

As this Article is still connected with the preceding on Works of Supererogation let’s give an end to the discussion saying this : Marriage is a work of the flesh, a marry priest indeed he cannot expect absolutely nothing  from the works natural to a marry man; if he did so, even the rats and the snakes and the ants would expect from God a reward for doing what Nature do in them. It is in this respect that Jesus spoke of the idiocy n waiting a reward, of any kind, for a service done under the laws of Nature. But Jesus was not speaking about Christ. A Virgin Priest is not a Work of the Flesh. A priest made at the Image of the Priesthood of Christ Himself, he is not under the Law of Nature, he is under the Law of the Divine Nature, and his life is an entire and complete Work of Supererogation. He lives for the Salvation of men, and the Sacrifice of his Flesh and Blood to God it is done looking to the Salvation of Mankind. He is the Blood and the Flesh of Christ, and it is to this Work of God in Nature, taking for Him a Body to live under the Rule of His Divinity, that we say “YES” we come to the Mass. How could the Work of God has no value?

But to raise the Question a level higher we have to put our feet on the ground where the Final Judgment will take place.

That the Final Judgment Day is a Work of God in order to Glorify His Son, there is no doubt. The Rising of the Son of God to the Throne of the Final Judgment Day implies the Fact already written, God putting in the Hands of His Son the Power of Life and Death over His entire Creation. The Universal Judge has been given the Power of God. He Judges as God. And as God He has the Power to heal all the souls of Mankind. As much as the Duty coming with the Power of the Universal King.

Universal Absolution for Mankind, or Judgment according to the Law of Prophecy, this depends upon which side the balance of justice will fall.

That the Judgment Day is a real Day of Justice and not a Circus of Gods we see it from the fact that Satan and his Rebels are not called in. God’s Damnation against His Enemies already signed, there is nothing to say about a Revision of Satan’s Case. The Final Judgment Day is related exclusively to Mankind. The Liberation of the Devil in the beginning of the Second Millennium was decided in order to cause an acceleration of the World Historical Circumstances leading to the  World Self-Destruction to which Mankind was condemned in the Day of the Fall of Adam, on one hand; and to accelerate the Coming of the sons of God, of the Line of Christ Jesus, on the other. Once this Coming on the ground the Hour has come for the King to hunt the Devil, free the Earth and lead Mankind to His Kingdom.

Once freed the Earth from the Power of the prince of Hell, the Last Battle of God to Free His Creation from Death will put Mankind in a position of Divine Freedom, this way opening to the centuries to come a New World Scenario, upon which ground to prove to the House of God that Mankind deserves Universal Absolution.

The Battle of God once taken to its end, the Liberation of Earth from the Devil done, it will begin a New Battle, the Battle of men for Mankind and every single move of Men and Nations will be a Work of Supererogation, a Prayer for the Salvation of the Fullness of the Nations.

How could the Works of the sons of God have no value when even the work of Five Heathens had that much weight before the eyes of God as to stop the Destruction of cities from old?

The Universal Day of Judgment is based on two principles :

1.-The Divinity of the Judge, invested with Omnipotent Power to sign the Absolution of Mankind, on the Basis of His All-Powerful Arm to Heal the Souls of the Fullness of the Human Nations.

And 2.-The Divine Duty of the King on Universal Peace, the mercy of today on a particular, tomorrow can become damnation for the universal. Mercy is related to Works of the Spirit, not of the Flesh.

Conclusion : The Spiritual Priesthood is the Guideline for all men to work for the Salvation of Mankind, while subjected to the Law of Nature, in order that when the Day comes God will find not Five but an entire World of Good Men ,with their Works, made in the Spirit, praying for the Absolution of the Human Race.

This said, let’s handle the new Article:

 

Christ in the truth of our nature was made like unto us in all things, sin only except; from which He was clearly void, both in His flesh and in His Spirit. He came to be the lamb without spot, who, by sacrifice of himself once made, should take away the sins of the world; and sin (as St. John saith) was not in Him. But all we the rest, although baptized and born again in Christ, yet offend in many things; and if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

 

Again we deal with the Doctrine of the Old Catholic Mother Church, a Doctrine repeated along the centuries by the same mouth with different names, the Mouth of Christ. Again, we see the political nature of the Anglican Reformation, behaving like politicians do, robbing their predecessors of their works, to sign their names on the work by others done, and when something wrong is done accusing their predecessors too. The English Nation was really so numb in the days of the Tyrant and his house as to have never read this Question?

The sole idea of naming sin on the Son of God is a crime. The Anglican Creed took the oldest doctrine of the Catholic Mother Church and made it hers while, as politicians do, sparing no time in condemning the Wife of the Lord because the behavior of a Servant of Her Husband? Why did not Her Husband cast out of His Presence the Servant by God Himself chose to be the hand in whose Finger the Ring of Her Divine Husband would shine, to remember  to Heaven and Earth that the day of the sons of God, of the Line of Christ Jesus, had to come? Will the Anglican Church raise damnation on Jesus Christ for having bowed down His Head  before the Election of God? Why Peter? Will the Anglican Church open her mouth to make known to God her objection on His Decision?

And on the question of our fragility, let me tell you this, where is the fool who expect from a warrior in under full attack to preserve his hands from blood?

It seems that Paradise Island, when coming to Theology, is full of divine fools.

POINT ONE : “That Christ was without sin, although in all other things made like unto us”, where is the news? Where’s the novelty? Do the Anglican folks to be reminded of the historical background and the blood spilt by the Catholic Nations in defense of this Point? So nuts were the English  in the days of the Tyrant and his house as to  have no clue on History of Christianity? About Yesterday, all right, we understand; about Today, there is no excuse; Freedom has three letters WWW. To discuss this point is nonsense.

POINT TWO: “That all other men (even though baptized and born again in Christ) yet offend in many things”, who will deny the fact? The Anglican Creed uses the Doctrine of the Catholic Church to attack the Catholic Church? It seems to me that the Anglican Church used this Article counting on the ignorance of the Anglican folk, who, once having been deprived of the Historical Background of the Christian Faith, was supposed to infer from this Article that the Catholic Church was and is sustaining the contrary thing. If so, why did the Cath0lic Church not blow away from the New testament Books the references due to this statement? She was omnipotent to do so. Who would have contested Her Right to do so? She did not because how could the Borgias and the like say that they were clean as cotton from sin? I mean, what was the point in making this POINT? Probably because like a malignant virus has to extract from the cell all its contents to insert itself, the Anglican Church, having not Creed bit the Catholic Creed, had to rob for free was not hers and defend her robbery with the Power of the Empire? However, if there is a man who can say “I am as free from sin as Jesus Christ”, hey, let him come.

And POINT THREE : “That Christ, though perfect man, was yet free from sin, properly forms a part of the doctrine of the Incarnation, and is there­fore intimately connected with Article II (Of the Word or Son of God which was made very Man.)”. The washing brain method is based on repetition, to the same thing in different ways until turning the subject into a perfect idiot. This point Three is the perfect example. The message for the Anglican folk is simple : “Remember, the Catholic Church always denied the Immaculate Conception of the Son of God”. However, the political aspect of the POINT cannot be obliterated from the answer. The maker of this article was as much religious as the devil. Which was made very Man, the Word of the Son of God? It looks like the guy in charge did not give a shit about it. The Word, the Son of God, who gives a shit? The real thing was the Empire, to reach Empire you got to have behind you a Mass of Fanatics, a Fundamentalist Mass ready to kill his own mother, if the occasion came around. The Word, the Son of God, who cares? The important thing is not Reality, but the Image of Reality you implant in the Brain of that perfect idiot ready to kill for king and country. The occasion, a reign of Terror, was the perfect situation room for implanting in the Brain of the United Kingdom a self-made Image of the Divine Reality. Jesus did not cast out Peter from His Church? Enough, He was a Jew, English have more “parts”!

Notwithstanding my criticizing, the matter of fact is that the Reformation Image of the Church was a fake. The Church did not belong to Christ. The Church belongs to God. The Church does not belong to England, or to Italy, or to Moscow, or to Rome for that matter. The Church belongs to God. How could the Son of God dispose of the Church as She was His Work? How could Germany and England and Switzerland and the other folks to do what not even the Omnipotent Son of God dared to do : To raise against the Chosen of God?

From Luther to Hitler, what? You begin to criticize one of the works of God and end up declaring work on His entire Creation. This is the evolution that son of God called Satan undertook and look who is now, the Devil! How could be a Devil without that Satan? And a Hitler without a Luther? Evolution doesn’t lie. If you low down the Work of God, the Spiritual Priesthood to the Flesh, how could you not end up turning the House of God into a Judas Home? Yesterday is the Priestess, today the Gay Priest, what Tomorrow, the Church of the Devil? What was began by an Antichrist King, where could take you anywhere else but to Hell?

The Battle for the Century has begun. God is rising His Unification Will upon the two sides of the sea to have Mercy on All and gather around the King His People in order to conquer the Doors of Hell and Free Earth from the Power of Death. Freedom is here. The choice belongs to every man.

All we can say from this Article is that in question of Creed there is no discussion between Anglican and Catholic. The POINT is : Where came from the Hate between? God is Love. Who is Hate?

Conclusion to make : while the world is such as we see it, to fall is our fate, to get up, again and again, our  Grace, but to use this circumstance to say “Sin, sin, sin, that the blood of Christ washes everything” is to give up Christ and kneel before the Antichrist king.