To understand the Fall of the Jews in that abyss of bestiality in which we see them sneaking around Jesus and their Disciples, we need to refer to the ignorance of the historians of the past centuries for not considering the influence of the Ten Tribes of Israel upon the Tribes of the Medes. The fact that the historians had and have not  consider the rule of History, talking about the influence of a people much more civilized over other people much less cultivated, it says volumes about the intellectual prejudices of the Historians of the Ancient History when the time came and come to talk about the Jews and the Hebrews.

In the case of the Ten Tribes of Israel and the Medes', we have a people, the Medes, from the dawn of national memory  living in Neolitic hunting conditions, wild and lawless. The tribes of the Medes, a prehistoric people, receive by the force of the Assyrian Yoke a flood of  Hebrews into their own ancestral land. The Hebrews were a vanquished people, humiliated by the Assyrians in the field of War; and yet those loosers were the heirs of the Commercial Empire of Solomon, the sons of the Army of that same King David who subdued the Flood of the Philistines and made the world dance to the rhythm of his sword.

Out of this volcano the Hebrew-Mede explosion was a question of time. A barbarian people, the Medes, and the most civilized nation of the moment, the Hebrews, both were united by the same conqueror in a single feeling : Hate of the Assyrian; and what it is most peculiar thing, they were left alone to whatever was to come out of their fusion. What else but the formation of the Kingdom of the Medes under Fraortes?  The myth of Deioces, coming from Palestina, the land of the Jews, it is not to be set aside as the historians have done. The sons of Noah have been from the very beginning of the Resurrection of Mesopotamia after the Deluge the fuel of Civilization; ir can be seen in the records of the past, where even the hero Gilgamesh connected himself with Noah by blood, and after him came Sargon the First, who is said to be a son of Shem, son of Noah.

It was Sargon the Second the Assyrian, (see the History of Assyria in the Ancient History Section), who deported the Hebrews to the land of the Medes, and just a generation after we see Deioces struggling for the Kingdom; and after him, Fraortes came to sit upon the Medes as King.

To blow away from this Historical Revolution the presence of the Hebrews among the Medes, a people who had been living like wild animals from the dawn of History, to forget this fact of the presence of the Hebrews in the land of the Medes as the fuel and the mortar that gave to the Hate of the Assyrian against the common enemy a structure to both nations, and gave origin to the Kingdom of the Medes,  indeed to forget this fact and to pretend to be called a Historian, it is, in my eye, a very dangerous claim.

No one but the Hebrews, with a long experience in the thing of Kings and Monarchical Government, no one but the heirs of the Miltary Kingdom of David and the Comercial Empire of Solomon could have given the Medes the intelligence necessary to turn wild tribes into a Nation of conquerors running for Empire. The reason for it, they had it, both of them, Medes and Israelites, the Hate of the Assyrian.

When we see that this Revolution was done in a single century, the blowing away by the Historians of the last centuries of this Hebrew Connection in the History of the Rising of the Empire of the Medes, got not ground for justification. Same thing talking about the Myth of the Lost of the Ten tribes of Israel; everybody knew and know that the Ten Tribes were deported to the land of the Medes inmediately and as result of the destruction of the Kingdom of Isarel by Sargon the Assyrian. The suite comes out of the Logic of History: they, Israelites and Medes, simply got mixed, and the Israelites became a part of the Kingdom of the Medes; a fact strongly historizedde day Harpagus surrender the crown of the Medes at the feet of Cyrus the Persian, the Chosen of the God of the Jews.

The History of Israel, as it is written, proves strongly enough that the recreation of the memory of the Jews after the Destruction of their Nation by the Romans, and of the Hebrews before the Fall of the Judaean Kings, while rising the modern Historians Intelligence to the height of the  fools, has done a lot of harm to the cause of the recreation of the memory of Civilization. Long before Greeks, Romans, Carthaginians and else were struggling for a piece of Freedom, the Israelites were fighting against the old empires of the Babylonians, Egyptians and Assyrians, till they got lashed to the bones and had to walk on their knees all the way to the land of the Medes.

The Median Nation, with a religion of gods and demons suited for wild animals, suddenly was confronted to the most high religion at the time on the planet. As the Roman conquered the Greeks and yet the Greek Culture conquered the Romans, same way the Hebrews conquered the Medes, much more quickly because the Medes were not the enemy, but an ally to count on for the destruction of Nineveh.

Let’s see now the Tale of Cyrus the Persian under the light of this Revolution.

 

REVOLUTION IN THE LAND OF THE PERSIANS

 

The Kingdom of Israel fell in the years 722/721 BC. The kingdom of Judah fell in the year 586 BC. The same fate, before suffered by the Ten Tribes, became the fate of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, though in this case the Land of the Deportation was not the land of the Medes but the land of the Conquerors, the Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar.

The way the Jews could revolutionize the History of the Chaldean could not be directed to the formation of a Kingdom or how to Govern a Monarchical State. Babylon City and State had experience, as Nation, wider than the experience of the Jews in those matters. But there was an area in which the Jews were far beyond than other people, the  Vision of the Future, of course. And it was in this area that the Future was revolutionized in a way to be surpassed only by the Revolution of the Son of God.

Yes, the historians of the Modern Ages, deprived, as any other man, of the Spirit, saw the Hand of God nowhere, and accordingly they preferred to make the Tale of Herodotus about the Rising of Cyrus the Great their starting point wherefrom to begin the History of the Persian Empire. Being of common knowledge the tale for children by Herodotus recollected about the origin of Cyrus, and because it seems to me that Civilization has grown enough to eat solid food, I will forget about the Myth and I will go straight to the point.

The destruction of Nineveh accomplished (612 BC), the Medes and the Chaldeans divided the world in two zones of influence. The Balance of Power, that conception by the XIXth Century masters adored with a fanaticism equal to their Pragmatic Policy, it was the daily bread in the days of the Mesopotamian Empires, and accordingly the Chaldeans of Nabopolassar extended the borders of their Power till the limits of the Persian frontiers, on one hand, and toward the dessert of Lybia, on the other hand. The King of the Medes extended his rule to the West, as far as he could set a foot in Europe, if he could, and to the North, up to the ends of Russia, if Russia got any. In this game of the kings, the Balance of Power, the kingdom of Persia was left dependent on the Court of Babylon. And as it was before and after, the king of Persia paid to Babylon his Independence with royal hostages.

It is in this dimension that some have seen Cyrus to be not the heir of his father but the second prince of the Crown. And being not the Crown Prince, Cyrus had to be surrendered to the Court of Babylon in token of Fidelity of his father’s Kingdom to the Crown of the Chaldeans, a measure that we see later on in the days of the Romans, when, after the failure of his army, Antiochus III had to send his second son, the later-on Antiochus IV Epiphanes, as token of fidelity to Rome.  This policy of Royal Hostages had been not an invention of the Romans; we see it everywhere and at all times in History, at least among civilized nations.

Now let’s consider the claim of Cyrus to the Triple Crown : the Persian', the Medes' and the Babylonians'.

To the Persian Throne, once dead his elder brother, the Crown was Cyrus'.

To the Median throne Cyrus had the right given to her child from a Princess of the Crown. Astiages the Fat (585-550 BC), son of Ciaxares the Great, King of the Medes, regarding to nullify a military alliance between the king of Babylon and the King of Persia against his Crown, gave his daughter to Cyrus' father, this way, while through the marriage of his daughter with the son of the Persian King breaking a possible alliance between the two kings of the South, causing a claim to the kingdom of the Medes by the part of the future king of the Persians. And so it was done. And it is this accomplished fact that Herodotus recollected and gave to it the shape of a tale for kids such as found in the Histories.

To the Babylonian Crown, Cyrus had right by his mother' side. Cyrus's grand mother was the the wife of Nebuchadnezzar, son of Nabopolassar the Chaldean, the partner of Ciaxares for the destruction of the Empire of the Assyrian. Amytis, Nebuchadnezzar's wife, was the daughter of Ciaxares and sister of Astiages. This Astiages, son of Ciaxares, married Aryenis, the sister of Croesus, King of Lydia. From this marriage came to the world the princess by his father given to the Persian King, father of Cyrus. This Median princess was the mother of Cyrus.

Again, after their victory over Nineveh, Nabopolassar gave his son, Nebuchadnezzar, to the daughter of Cyaxares, and Cyaxares did take the daughter of Napobolassar for his son Astyages, whom at the same time received the daughter of Croeses as a royal concubine; this kind of blood alliances it was called the game of the kings. Following the rule of this game Astiages the Fat gave his own daughter to the king of the Persians, in this way opening a claim to the throne of Babylon by a future Persian king. No one foresaw this end, but this was what at the end happened.

One more time, Astiages gave his daughter to the king of Persia, an of-course offense to the Princess of the Medes most probably, who became a royal concubine instead of a Queen, a type of marriage seen everywhere in the Region from the days of the Egyptians, the Hittites and so forth. Her child, Cyrus, born from a Median Princess, and because his mother was a Royal Concubine, was destined to be a Royal Hostage in the Court of Babylon. And so it was done.

To forget, as the Historians did, that Persia was a second power in the days of the Medes and Chaldeans, it is the factor which led the modern historians to the feet of Herodutus, taking as History what was juts a tale for kids .

Back to our main line, Cyrus' succession line to the throne of Persia, only, and just only, if the Crown Prince of Persia, his elder brother, born from his father's Persian Queen, was killed in battle, or by chance he died somehow before reaching his father’s Throne, Cyrus could claim the Kingdom of the Persians, which he could do with all the right on his side as the Royal Hostage of the Persian King that he was.  Natural logic says that the Persian Crown Prince, Cyrus' elder brother, would succeed his father the King, and the succession line would pass to his own children, losing Cyrus any claim, except by a coup d’état, to the Throne of Susa. But if, by any natural circumstance, Cyrus's elder brother died, and Cyrus was proclaimed King of Persia as Cyrus II, he would succeed to the Throne of Persia with a claim upon the crown of Astiages the Fast, his grandfather, and of Nabopolassar, father of his great grandmother, and of his grand mother, the Lydian Princess Aryenis

Lot of things had to pass before the logical way of men gave way to the illogical way of God.

 

REVOLUTION IN THE LAND OF THE CHALDEANS

 

The Court of the Chaldean Nebuchadnezzar became, by the law of the Balance of Power, the centre for education of the Princes of the Foreign Nations under the Zone of Influence of the New Babylonian Empire. Knowing we that the Empires were constructed upon a military social class, there is no objection to see the The House of the Royal Hostages in the hands of the learned Servants of the crown, in this case, the Magi.

No one would have believed, even if it should been told, that the last of the nations conquered by the Chaldean King would see the rising of one of his men to the Leadership of this College of Magi. But this was what came to happen when a Jew, named Daniel, found favor in the eyes of the king and, embibed with the Spirit of God, reached the Leadership of the School of the Magi, in whose hands was the education of the Royal Hostages.

Cyrus was a young lad when Daniel was already the Master of the Magi. The influence and power of the Chief of the Magi upon the young prince of Persia became more and more intense as Cyrus began to believe in his Future as told to him by this Tutor. Yes, the God of the gods had chosen him, Cyrus, to be the Founder of an Empire which will cover the entire civilized world by then known. God would give Cyrus the Crown of Persia and God’s People would open for him the Doors of Media and Babylon. He, Cyrus, the king of kings, he will pay back God’s People with Freedom.

The way God raised Daniel to the Leadership of the School of the Magi is told in the Bible; the way God destroyed Nineveh with the arms of the king, is told in the books of History; to read both facts and  put them not together having been the rule of the historian of the modern ages, out of their pens came books good for nothing, except to feed darkness. But History says that when Cyrus entered the Kingdom of the Chaldeans the Jews were the Door-keepers of the great cities of the New Empire of Babylon. And all of them left free entrance to the Chosen of God, by which hand the Decree of Freedom have been already signed. To protest this conclusion is nonsense, and madness to rise any argument against it when History is witness to these facts.

 

REVOLUTION IN ECBATANA

 

Who was Harpagus the Mede but a Hebrew of the Ten Tribes? To violent this truth they run a tale about the mother of Cyrus and this general in chief of the forces of the Medes, causing to be Harpagus the real father of Cyrus. The mystery in the surrender of the army of the Medes, who would we see it not? How many times in the History of War a General in Chief has laid plain the victory at the feet of the enemy, conquering victory without striking a single blow? The simple answer and most accessible to the animal reader is that Harpagus and the mother of Cyrus had a sex affair, and in revenge for the denial of the king to proceed to the consummation of the amour thing, decades after Harpagus surrendered the kingdom to the bastard of the King of Persia. Nonsense! Food for idiots.

The Hebrews of the Median Land mixed with the barbarian Medes but, as always pass with the children of Abraham, some maintained their blood in the pure sense of Moses' Law, and from this stock was born the Harpagus who, at the order of the Prophet of Jacob’s God, laid at the feet of the Chosen One the Keys of the Kingdom of the Medes.

We have not to forget that the fame of Hebrews did suffer very much at the hand of the Hebrews of Judah, that much as the fame of Jews at the hands of the Christian Nations. And because this fame, forged after the Fall of Jerusalem by the Romans, the Jews who reached the XXth Century were stained with the fame of the classic Venetian Jew. But History does not tell lies, and we see the Jews under the Ptolomies and under the Seleucids fighting in the first line of the battle, leading the armies of the kings, and becoming a legend while still alive, as in the case of Judas the Maccabee.

 Returning to Harpagus, who could be the natural leader of the army of the Medes of Fraortes and Cyaxares but a son of a Nation of Warriors during centuries fighting for freedom, the Hebrews of the Ten Tribes? Barbarians, we see in the books of history, fight like animals, with teeth and claws, their wars do not reckon the science of War.  War is a science and battle is the time to put on practice its law. These two Sciences the Hebrews of the kingdom of Israel carried to the Land of the Medes, the Science of the Administration of a Kingdom, and the science of War. Who in the Land of the Medes could have been the natural War Chief, under the Obedience of the King, but a Hebrew?

Does a Jew lose his religion because living under a foreign power? If a man can lead a nation to revolution, when God goes for Revolution how far in time would its effects be felt?

The stupidity of the European nations while considering all the Jews to be  bad copies of the Venetian Jew, and the idiocy of the historians to consider all the Jews equal to that dead-long generation of fools who  dared to put a finger on the Son of God, both  prejudices  blinded the historians of the XIXth and XXth Centuries when the hour came to see the Abrahamic Nation in the midst of the revolutions which determined the configuration of the  World in the days of the Son of God, days to which  we can indeed apply the Vision of God, “No one good”.

Why there was no good man in the days of the Lord we have seen it in the past section. There rest lot of things to be considered before getting into the Holy of the Hollies, the Mind of the Son of God. I will take you there as times goes by.