A STUDY IN THE HISTORY OF HELLENISM
5. Ethics.
The good which is beyond beauty is also
beyond moral virtue, as we saw at an earlier stage of the exposition. The
attainment of it belongs to the mystical consummation of Plotinus's philosophy,
and not properly to its ethical any more than to its aesthetical part. At the
same time, it is not regarded as attainable without previous discipline both in
practical moral virtue and in the pursuit of intellectual wisdom. The mere
discipline is not sufficient by itself to assure the attainment of the end; but
it is, to begin with, the only path to follow.
In treating of virtue on its practical
side, Plotinus differs from his Stoical predecessors chiefly in the stress he
lays on the interpretation even of civic virtue as a preliminary means of
purifying the soul from admixture with body. The one point where he decidedly goes
beyond them in the way of precept is his prohibition of suicide except in the
rarest of cases. Here he returns in the letter of the prohibition to the view
of earlier moralists. The philosopher must no longer say to his disciples, as
during the period of the Stoic preaching, that if they are in any way
dissatisfied with life "the door is open." A moralist under the
Empire cannot, on the other hand, take the ground of Aristotle, that suicide is
an injury to the State. No public interest was so obviously affected by the
loss of a single unit as to make this ground of appeal clearly rational. The
argument Plotinus makes use of is substantially that which Plato borrowed from
the Pythagoreans. To take a violent mode of departing from the present life
will not purify the soul from the passions that cling to the composite being,
and so will not completely separate it and set it free from metempsychosis.
Through not submitting to its appointed discipline, it may even have to endure
a worse lot in its next life. So long as there is a possibility of making
progress here, it is better to remain.
The view that in moral action the inward
disposition is the essential thing, is to be found already, as a clearly
formulated principle, in Aristotle. The Stoics had persistently enforced it;
and now in Plotinus it leads to a still higher degree of detachment,
culminating as we shall see in mysticism. Porphyry made the gradation of the
virtues by his master somewhat more explicit; and Iamblichus was, as Vacherot has remarked, more moderate and practical in his
ethical doctrine; but invariably the attitude of the school is one of extreme
inwardness. Not only is the inner spring that by which moral action is to be
tested; the all-important point in relation both to conduct and insight is to
look to the true nature of the soul and, keeping this in view, to rid it of its
excrescences. First in the order of moral progress are the
"political" virtues, which make the soul orderly in the world of
mixture. After these conic the "cathartic" virtues, which prepare it
to ascend to the ideal world. Positive virtue is attained simply by the soul's
turning back to the reality it finds when with purged sight it looks within;
and it may find this reality as soon as the negative "purification"
has been accomplished.
The perfect life of the sage is not in
community but in detachment. If he undertakes practical activity, it must be
from some plain obligation, and the attitude of detachment ought still to be
maintained internally. Neither with Plotinus nor with any of his successors is
there the least doubt that the contemplative life is in itself superior to the
life of action. Here they are Aristotelian. The chance that the philosopher as
such may be called on to reform practical life seems to them much more remote
than it did to Plato. Yet, in reference to politics, as Zeller points out, a
certain predilection may be noticed for the "Platonic aristocracy."
It may be observed also that Plotinus by implication condemns Asiatic monarchy
as unjust and contrary to nature. And the view is met with incidentally that
practical wisdom is the result of deliberation in common; each by himself being
too weak to achieve it. Thus, in the single resolution arrived at by the joint
effort of all, political assemblies imitate the unity that is in the world.
That genuine freedom or self-dependence
belongs properly to the contemplative and not to the active life Plotinus
maintains in one place by the following argument. If virtue itself were given
the choice whether there should be wars so that it might exercise courage, and
injustice so that it might define and set in order what is just, and poverty so
that it might display liberality, or that all things should go well and it
should be at peace, it would choose peace. A physician like Hippocrates, for
example, might choose, if it were within his choice, that no one should need
his art. Before there can be practical virtue, there must be external objects
which come from fortune and are not chosen by us. What is to be referred to
virtue itself and not to anything external, is the trained aptitude of
intelligence and the disposition of will prior to the occasion of making a
choice. Thus all that can be said to be primarily willed apart from any
relation forced upon us to external things, is unimpeded theoretical activity
of mind.
In another book, the philosopher sets
himself to defend in play the paradox that all outgoing activity is ultimately
for the sake of contemplation. Production and action mean everywhere either an
inability of contemplation to grasp its object adequately without going forth
of itself, or a secondary resultant not willed but naturally issuing from that
which remains in its own higher reality. Thus external action with its results,
whether in the works of man or of nature, is an enfeebled product of
contemplation. To those even who act, contemplation is the end; since they act
so that they may possess a good and know that they possess it, and the
knowledge of its possession is only in the soul. Practice, therefore, as it
issues from theory, returns to its. At the end of the book Plotinus, passing
beyond the half-serious view hitherto developed, indicates that the first
principle of all is prior even to contemplation. Here occurs the comparison of
it to the spring of life in the root of an immense tree. This produces all the
manifold life of the tree without becoming itself manifolds. It is the good
which has no need even of mind, while mind contemplates and aspires after it.
The doubt for Plotinus is not whether the
contemplative life is higher than the life of action, but whether it can
properly be described as consisting in volition. Volition, he holds, is hardly
the right term to apply to pure intellect and the life in accordance with it.
Still less is it applicable to the One before intellect. Yet, as he also
insists, to speak of the first principle as not-will and not-thought and
not-knowledge would be even more misleading than the application to it of the
positive terms. What is denied of the primal things is not denied in the sense
that they are in want of it, but in the sense that they have no need of it,
since they are beyond it. On the other hand, when the individual nature takes
upon itself, as appears, one addition after another, it is in truth becoming
more and more deprived of reality. To recover the reality that is all, it must
dismiss the apparent additions—which, if they indeed affected the being that
remains, would be diminutions—and return to itself. Of such additions are
practical activities. In the world of mixture they are necessary, but they must
be treated as such, not thought of as conferring something more upon the soul
than it has in itself. Only by rising above them in self-knowledge can the soul
become liberated. Otherwise, it remains attached to its material vehicle, and
changes from body to body as from one sleep to another. "True waking is a
true rising up from the body, not with a body." This cannot be completely
attained by practical virtue, which belongs to the composite nature and not to
the separable soul; as the poet indicates in the Odyssey when he places the
shade of Hercules in Hades but "himself among the gods." The hero has
been thought worthy to ascend to Olympus for his noble deeds, but, as his
virtue was practical and not theoretical, he has not wholly ascended, but
something of him also remains below. The man of practical virtue, as the
Homeric account is interpreted elsewhere, will retain some memory of the
actions he performed on earth; though he will forget what is bad or trivial;
the man of theoretic virtue, possessing now intuitive knowledge, will dismiss
all memories whatever. Memory, however, seems to be thought of not as actually
perishing, but as recoverable should the soul redescend to relation with the material universe.
Here Plotinus is expressing himself, after
Plato, in terms of metempsychosis. As in the Platonic representation of the
future life, intermissions are supposed during which the purified soul gets
temporary respite from occupation with a body. Plotinus, however, as we have
seen, does not treat that which is distinctively called the Platonic
"reminiscence" as more than a myth or a metaphor. When the soul, even
here, is energizing in accordance with pure intellect, it is not "remembering."
Memory is of past experience, and is relative to time and its divisions. The
energy of pure intellect is not in relation to time, but views things in the
logical order of concepts. Hence it is that the better soul strives to bring
the many to one by getting rid of the indefinite multiplicity of detail; and so
commits much to oblivion.
Consistently with this general view,
Plotinus holds that the happiness of the sage receives no increase by
continuance of time. We cannot make a greater sum by adding what no longer
exists to what now is. Time can be measured by addition of parts that are not,
because time itself, the "image of eternity," belongs to things that
become and are not. Happiness belongs to the life of being, and this is
incommensurable with the parts of time. Is one to be supposed happier for
remembering the pleasure of eating a dainty yesterday or, say, ten years ago;
or, if the question is of insight instead of pleasure, through the memory of
having had insight last year? remember things that went well in the past
belongs to one who has them not in the present and, because now he has them
not, seeks to recall those that have been. To the argument that time is
necessary for the performance of fair deeds, the reply is, first, that it is
possible to be happy—and not less but more so--outside the life of action. In
the next place, happiness comes not from the actual performance of the deeds,
but from the disposition with which they are done. The man of right disposition
will find happiness in disinterested appreciation, for example, of patriotic
deeds which he has not himself had the opportunity of performing. Hence (as the
Stoics also held against Aristotle) length of life is not necessary for its
moral perfection.
Several points of the ethics of Plotinus
are brought together in a book giving a philosophical interpretation of the
fancy that to each person is allotted his particular genius or
"daemon." Plotinus's interpretation is that the daemon of each of us
is the power next above that in accordance with which his actual life is led.
For those who live the common life according to sense-perception, it is reason;
for those who live the life of reason, it is the power above that. How then, he
asks, with reference to the "lots" in the Republic, if each while
"there" chooses his tutelary daemon and his life "here,"
are we masters of anything in our actions? The explanation he suggests is, that
by its mythical choice once for all "there," is signified the soul's
will and disposition in general everywhere. Continuing in terms of the Platonic
imaginations on the destiny of souls, he observes that since each soul, as a
microcosm, contains within itself a representation not only of the whole
intelligible world, but also of the soul which guides the visible universe, it
may find itself, after departure from the body, in the sun or one of the
planets or in the sphere of the fixed stars, according as it has energized with
the power related to this or that part of the whole. Those souls that have overpassed the "daemonic nature" are at this
stage of their mutation outside all destiny of birth and beyond the limits of
the visible heaven.