![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN THE FIRST CENTURY. CHAPTER IV.
PAUL'S SECOND JOURNEY
IT was now time that the great apostle of the Gentiles should I
undertake a second missionary journey. It was his wish to have travelled, as
before, in company with Barnabas: but they disagreed as to taking with them a
nephew of Barnabas, and set out in different directions. We may truly say, in
this instance, that God brought good out of evil. It was evil that the two
apostles should have any feelings of towards each other: but the division of
their labours carried the Gospel more rapidly over a
greater extent of country. It was natural that Barnabas should begin his
journey by visiting Cyprus, the country with which he was connected by birth;
and it was equally natural that Paul should take an interest in the Cilician
churches, which were among the first that he had planted, but which he had not
visited on his former journey. His present companion was Silas, or Silvanus,
who had come with him on his last return from Jerusalem; and, having passed
through Cilicia, they visited the countries of Pisidia and Lycaonia, which had received the Gospel from Paul
and Barnabas about a year before.
They now carried with them the letter of the council which settled the
Christian liberty of the Gentile converts; and this might at first make us
still more surprised to find Paul requiring one of his own converts to be
circumcised. This was Timothy, who was a Jew only on his mother's side, and had
not been circumcised before. He had probably embraced the Gospel during St
Paul's former visit to this country; and the apostle perceived in him so much
zeal, together with such a knowledge of the Jewish Scriptures, that he decided
upon engaging him as a companion and fellow-labourer.
The policy of having him circumcised was very apparent; for no Jew would
have listened to his preaching if this ceremony had been known to be omitted.
Nor was there anything inconsistent in Paul circumcising Timothy, though he was
bearer of the decree which pronounced such an act unnecessary, and though he
had himself persisted in preventing the circumcision of Titus. If he had
consented in the case of Titus, he would have countenanced the notion that
faith in Christ was not sufficient for justification without circumcision; for
that was then the question under discussion.
But Timothy had been baptized into all the privileges of the Gospel,
without being circumcised. Hundreds, if not thousands, of converts had been
admitted in the same country, who were wholly independent of the Law of Moses.
It was only when Paul decided to take Timothy with him on his journey, and when
he wished to make him serviceable in converting the Jews, that he used the
precaution of having him circumcised. To Timothy himself, it was a mere outward
ceremony; but it might make him the means of persuading others to embrace the
doctrines which he bore impressed upon his heart.
Paul and his companions now traversed a much larger portion of the
continent of Asia than he had visited on his first journey. Churches were
planted by them in Phrygia and Galatia; and when they came to the sea-coast at
Troas, their company was further increased by Luke, who is supposed to have
been a native of Antioch, and a proselyte to the Law of Moses. He had followed
the profession of a physician; but, from this time, he devoted himself to
preaching the Gospel, and for several years was either a fellow-traveller with
Paul, or took the charge of churches which the apostle had planted. It was a
bold measure for four Jews to introduce a new religion into Greece, the country
which might still be said to take the lead in literature and science, though it
had yielded in arms to Rome. The Greeks and Romans had long been acquainted
with the Jews; but they looked upon their religion as a foolish superstition,
and treated their peculiar customs with contempt.
This treatment might be provoking to individual Jews, but it generally
ensured for them toleration as a people; and hence they were seldom prevented
from establishing a residence in any town within the Roman empire. The Jews
repaid this indulgence by taking little pains to make proselytes. In their
hearts they felt as much contempt for the superstitions of the heathen, as the
latter professed openly for the Jews; but they were content to be allowed to
follow their own occupations, and to worship the God of their fathers without
molestation. The Christians might have enjoyed the same liberty, if their
principles had allowed it; and for some time the heathen could not, or would
not, consider them as anything else than a sect of the Jews. But a Christian
could not be sincere without wishing to make proselytes. He could not see
religious worship paid to a false God without trying to convince the worshipper
that he was following a delusion. The Divine Founder of Christianity did not
intend it to be tolerated, but to triumph. It was to be the universal, the only
religion; and though the apostles, like the rest of their countrymen, could
have borne with personal insults and contempt, they had but one object in view,
and that was to plant the Cross of Christ upon the ruins of every other
religion.
This could not fail, sooner or later, to expose the preachers of the
Gospel to persecution; for every person who was interested in keeping up the
old religions would look upon the Christians as his personal enemies. Hitherto,
however, we have seen the heathen take little notice of the new doctrines. They
had been first planted in Palestine, where the heathen had, necessarily, little
influence; and those countries of western Asia, which were the next to receive
them, were some of the least civilized in the Roman empire. Whenever the Gospel
had met with opposition, the Jews were the promoters of it. They considered the
Gospel as destructive of the law of Moses: and the notion of being saved by
faith in a crucified Redeemer was opposed by the bigoted Jews with the most
violent hostility.
The apostles were now entering upon a new field. They were approaching
the countries in which learning and philosophy had made the greatest progress;
and the pride of learning, when ignorant or regardless of the knowledge which
comes from heaven, has always been one of the most formidable enemies of the
Gospel. The Greeks and Romans were also intolerant of any new religion. The
Greeks were unwilling to listen to it, unless it was connected with some system
of philosophy. The Romans had passed many laws to prevent the introduction of
new religions; and though these laws were not always enforced, it was in the
power of any magistrate, who was so disposed, to execute them with vexatious
severity.
St Paul in
Europe.
Paul and his companions had not been long in Macedonia, before they were
exposed to a persecution of this kind. Philippi was the town in which they were
first arrested; and Paul and Silas were thrown into prison, after having been
publicly scourged. It is not easy to understand the precise nature of the charge
which was brought against them; and the magistrates of a provincial town may
not have been particular in observing the forms of justice towards two Jews.
We know, however, that they were accused of violating some of the laws
of Rome; and they might have been said to do this, when they denounced all the
religious observances of the Romans as wicked and abominable. Heathenism was
the established religion of the empire; and the apostles, by endeavoring to
destroy it, might naturally be said to be setting themselves against the laws.
Added to which, the unbelieving Jews took pains to publish everywhere, that the
Christians looked up to Jesus as their king; by which they meant to persuade
the heathen authorities, that the Christians were not loyal to the emperor: and
it appears to have been upon one or both of these charges, that Paul and Silas
were thrown into prison at Philippi. Their imprisonment, however, did not last
long. Their chains were loosened by a miracle; and the magistrates were too
happy to persuade them to leave the city, when they found that both of them
possessed the freedom of Rome.
It might perhaps excite our surprise, that Paul did not plead his Roman
citizenship before he was scourged and imprisoned, and to have escaped these
indignities; but we cannot tell what motives he may have had for suppressing
this fact, when he was first brought before the magistrates. His miraculous
release was the means of converting the jailor and his family to believe in
Christ; and the salvation of even one soul was a sufficient compensation to the
apostle for any sufferings which he might undergo. Had he pleaded his
citizenship at first, though he would not have been scourged, he might have
been imprisoned, or even put to death, on the charge of treason against the
laws; so that, by taking such a course, he might have delayed, or even
destroyed, his efficiency as a preacher of the Gospel: whereas, by submitting
to the indignity of being scourged, and by frightening the magistrate, who had
ordered the punishment without knowing the condition of his prisoner, he
obtained immediate release, without even going through the form of a trial.
His imprisonment at Philippi did not last more than a single day; and
though it was found advisable for himself and Silas to leave the city, Luke
appears to have continued there; and there is reason to think, that the
Macedonian churches enjoyed the advantage of his presence for some years.
Paul and his two other companions visited Amphipolis, Appollonia, Thessalonica, and Beroea.
In almost every town they found the same scene acted over again—of the Jews
exciting the populace against them, and endeavoring to expel them by the
interference of the magistrates. They could not, however, prevent the Gospel
making great progress in Macedonia. The miracles which Paul worked, and the
spiritual gifts which he imparted to his converts, made a much greater
impression than the misrepresentations and calumnies of the Jews. The
Christians of Thessalonica were held in particular esteem by the apostle, and
it was with great reluctance that he paid them so short a visit; but his
bigoted countrymen obliged him to retire: and, not satisfied with driving him
from Thessalonica, they followed him to Berea, and forced him once more to take
his departure.
Silas and Timothy continued in Macedonia, but Paul went on to Athens;
and, without any companion, ventured to preach the doctrines of the Cross in
the most philosophical and most superstitious city of Greece. His success must
have been quite as great as he expected, when Dionysius, a member of the Court
of Areopagus, became one of his converts; and,
leaving the Christians at Athens under his charge, he arrived, before winter,
at Corinth.
The name of Dionysius the Areopagite became
very celebrated in after ages; but it was principally in consequence of some
voluminous writings, which have been quoted as written by him, but which are
undoubtedly spurious, and were perhaps composed as late as the fourth century.
Little or nothing is known authentically of Dionysius, except the brief notice
of him which is found in the Acts of the Apostles; but a bishop of Corinth, who
lived within a hundred years of this time, speaks of him as having been the
first bishop of Athens: from which we may safely conclude that the Athenian
Christians were committed to his care. The Church of Athens continued to
flourish for a long time, and we know the names of some of its bishops in the
second century; so that there may have been good reasons for the memory of
Dionysius being held in such esteem. Paul does not appear to have resided long
at Athens: but, while he was at Corinth, he was at no great distance off; and
the Athenian converts may have had the benefit of his counsel, if he did not
occasionally visit them in person.
The Epistles
to the Thessalonians.
This was the extent of his travels in the south of Greece; and he must
have thought Corinth an important station for his missionary labours, when he stayed there the long period of eighteen
months. The Jews tried in vain to excite the proconsul against him; but Gallio, who filled the office, happened to be a man who had
no taste for religious disputes; and the fact of Paul having succeeded in
converting. Crispus, the chief person in the
synagogue, must have been a great triumph to the cause of the Gospel. During
his residence at Corinth, (from which place he wrote his two epistles to the
Thessalonians,) Paul was joined by Silas and Timothy, from Macedonia; and the
result of their united efforts was the founding of a flourishing church in one
of the largest and most learned cities of Greece.
The learning of the Greeks was a new evil which the apostle had to
contend with; and one which was more fatal to the souls of men, than the sword
of persecution. Religious impressions are not often destroyed by opposition;
but persons who would walk fearlessly to the stake, for the sake of the Gospel,
may be seduced, by a show of learning, to take a false view of the religion
which they profess. Paul's Corinthian converts were surrounded with dangers of
this kind. His own education had made him well suited to dispute with heathen
philosophers; and the church which he founded at Corinth, was a proof that his
arguments were successful as well as powerful. The Gnostic doctrines, which
were spoken of above, in connection with the history of Simon Magus, appear, at
this time, to have spread as far as Corinth; and if heathen superstition was
likely to hinder men from embracing the Gospel, the errors of the Gnostics were
likely to pervert and ruin those who had already embraced it: all which may
enable us to understand why Paul stayed such a long time at Corinth.
Early in the year 48, he sailed from Greece; and having touched at
Ephesus, proceeded to Jerusalem, where he kept the feast of Pentecost. This
unhappy country had been suffering many calamities since his last visit to it,
two years before. After the death of Herod Agrippa, it had again fallen under
the government of Roman procurators; and, as if these officers, who were
proverbially rapacious, were not sufficient to practise oppression, when appointed singly, there were now two men, Cumanus and Felix, who had the districts of Judea, Samaria, and Galilee, divided
between them.
The reign of Claudius was, in other respects, unfavourable to the Jews. That emperor, for some reason or other, which is not expressly
told, ordered them all to quit Rome; and we know that this edict must have
caused several thousand persons to look for a home in other countries. It can
hardly be doubted that many Christians were sufferers at the same time; for the
heathen had not yet learned to distinguish them from the Jews. But this can
hardly be called a persecution; and their banishment may not have been owing to
any cause connected with their religion. There is also reason to think that the
prohibition against their returning to Rome did not last long, but it was
likely to have caused many Jews to go back, for a time at least, to the land of
their fathers, and their residence in Palestine would serve to increase the feelings
of hatred against the Romans, which the rapacity and violence of the
procurators had already fomented. Paul's visit to Jerusalem, at this season of
misgovernment, was short; and, going from thence to Antioch, he found the
Christians of that city continuing in the flourishing condition in which he had
left them. Tradition is constant in naming Enodius as the first bishop of
Antioch; and we may, perhaps, conclude that he had already entered upon his
office, at the time of Paul coming to the city, in the year 48.
St Paul at
Ephesus.
After leaving Antioch, the apostle traversed, for the second time, the
whole extent of Asia Minor, and took up his residence at Ephesus, which he had
visited a few months before, on his way from Corinth to Jerusalem. Ephesus was
the capital of a province, and the residence of the Roman proconsul. If its
fame for learning and philosophy was not equal to that of Athens or Corinth, it
was probably the city of the greatest wealth and luxury which Paul had as yet
visited. Whatever was splendid and costly had particular attractions for the
inhabitants of Ephesus. They had also been addicted, for a long time, to the
arts and delusions practised by the pretenders to
magic; and, at the period of Paul coming to reside among them, the Gnostic
philosophy, of which magic formed a prominent ingredient, was beginning to gain
ground in this part of Asia Minor. All this may account for Paul choosing to
make so long a residence in Ephesus. It opened a new and wide field for his
apostolical labours; and it was also a central spot,
from whence he could easily visit in person, or at least receive accounts from
the churches which he had planted in Greece.
There is no evidence of the Gospel having made much progress in Ephesus
itself before the arrival of Paul. It had been visited by Apollos,
a learned Jew of Alexandria; who, after being converted to Christianity by some
of Paul's companions, passed on to Corinth, and was of great use to the
Christians in that city, who were now deprived of the presence of the apostle.
Paul's residence at Ephesus continued for great part of three years,
though it is not necessary to suppose that he confined himself for the whole of
that time to the walls of the city, or even to its neighborhood. He appears to
hate paid visits to his converts in other parts of Asia Minor; and there is
scarcely any period but this to which we can ascribe those persecutions and
misfortunes which befell him in preaching the Gospel. He speaks of having been
imprisoned and scourged on several occasions: he had also suffered shipwreck
three times; and there is good reason to think that on one, at least, of these
voyages he had visited the island of Crete. It is certain, from his own words,
that he planted the Gospel there, and that Titus, who accompanied him, was left
by him to take charge of the churches. This is the earliest notice which we
find of any regular plan of church government. The island contained many
distinct congregations, as might be expected from its numerous cities and towns.
Each of these congregations was governed by its own presbyters; but the
appointment of the presbyters was specially committed by Paul to Titus, who
stayed behind in the island to arrange these matters; and while he continued
there he acted as the resident head of all the Cretan churches.
The superintendence of so many Christian communities was now becoming
very burdensome to the apostle; and it gives us a melancholy idea of the
inherent corruption of the human heart when we find Paul's Corinthian converts so
soon forgetting the instruction which he had given them, or, at least,
listening to false and insidious teachers. He had resided among them for the
long period of eighteen months, and the Church of Corinth might be considered,
at the time of his leaving it, to be one of the most flourishing which he had
hitherto planted.
He had, accordingly, bestowed upon its members a plentiful distribution
of these preternatural gifts of the Spirit which it was the privilege of the
apostles alone to communicate. It was hardly possible for men to lay aside
their belief in Christ when they had such standing evidence of their religion
corning from God; but the very abundance of these spiritual gifts was the cause
of jealousies and irregularities among the Corinthian Christians.
Forgetting that they had received these miraculous powers as an evidence
to themselves and others of the truth of what they believed, they were fond of
exercising them merely for ostentation, and to prove that they were themselves
more highly favoured than the rest. The gift of
tongues was particularly calculated for this idle display. The apostles, as we
have seen, possessed it to a wonderful extent; and they must have found it of
the greatest service when they had to preach the Gospel to men of different
nations.
But it was also a most convincing evidence to men who were not
travelling into foreign countries, and who had merely to converse with their
immediate friends and neighbors. If a native of Corinth, who had hitherto been
able to speak no language but Greek, found himself, on a sudden, and without
any study on his part, able to converse with a Jew, or with any other of the
numerous foreigners who came to the port of Corinth, he could hardly resist the
conviction that the power was given him by God; and when he knew also that he
received it in consequence of Paul having laid his hands upon him, and that he
did not receive it till his mind had fully assented to the doctrines which Paul
had preached, it seemed necessarily to follow that his assent to these
doctrines was approved by God.
The Gift
of Tongues.
Thus far the gift of tongues operated as an evidence to the believer
himself, and was calculated to keep him in the faith which was so
preternaturally confirmed. But it would also have the effect of convincing
others; for if a Corinthian, who was not yet converted, heard one of his
acquaintance speaking a foreign language, and if he knew that the power of
speaking it was acquired in a moment, he would be inclined to argue, as the
believer himself had done, that a religion which was so powerfully confirmed
must come from God. It was with this double view, of keeping his own converts
steadfast in their faith, and of enabling them to win over the heathen to join
them, that Paul appears to have distributed these gifts so abundantly in all
the churches which he planted.
It was not the immediate object of preaching the Gospel in foreign
countries which made the gift of tongues so valuable at Corinth; and we know
that in their own religious meetings, where there were perhaps no persons
present except Jews and Greeks, and consequently no occasion existed for
conversing in foreign languages, yet the Christians who possessed such a gift
were frequently in the habit of exercising it.
It seems obvious to remark that such an exhibition of the gift of
tongues would be of no service, not even as an evidence of preternatural power,
unless the other persons present in the congregation understood the language
which was thus publicly spoken. If a native of Corinth delivered a speech in
Persian or Celtic, it was necessary that some of the persons present should
know the words to belong to those languages; for, without this knowledge, there
was no evidence of a miraculous gift, and the speakers might have been merely uttering
unintelligible sounds, which differed, not only from the Greek, but from every
other language.
Though the Corinthians abused the power which had been given them, there
is no reason to think that their abuse of it showed itself in this way. They were
fond of speaking in unknown tongues; but they were merely unknown to the
inhabitants of Corinth, who had learned nothing but Greek: they were real
languages, which were known and spoken in other parts of the world; and if an
inhabitant of one of these countries had happened to be present at the meeting,
he would have recognised and understood the sounds of
his own language.
The apostle, however, had provided that these unknown tongues should
become intelligible even to the Greeks of Corinth. It was a most astonishing
miracle, that a man should be suddenly able to express his ideas in a language
which he had never learnt. But the power of the Holy Spirit was not confined to
influencing the organs of speech: it acted also upon the organs of hearing, or
rather upon the faculties of comprehension; and some persons found themselves
able to understand languages which they had never learnt.
It is plain that all the Christians at Corinth did not possess this
power. Those who exercised the gift of tongues in the congregation, were, as
has been already remarked, unintelligible to nearly all their hearers; but
there were some who were gifted to understand these foreign languages; and when
one person had delivered the words which the Spirit put into his mouth, another
person translated them into Greek, and so made them intelligible to all that
heard them. In this manner the gift of tongues had a practical use, beyond the
evidence which it furnished to the truth of the Gospel; and the Christians, who
attended the meetings without having themselves received either of these gifts,
had the advantage of receiving instruction from persons who were manifestly
under the influence of the Holy Spirit.
But though the edification of the Church was the ultimate object of all
these gifts, there were many of Paul's converts at Corinth, who, after he had
left them, forgot the purpose for which they had received such invaluable
blessings. The gift of tongues was by no means the only instance of
preternatural power which was imparted to believers. Miracles of various kinds
were worked by them; of which, the curing of diseases was, perhaps, the most
remarkable: but the possession of such extraordinary powers gave rise, in not a
few instances, to jealousy and self-conceit. This may partly be ascribed to the
ordinary and natural corruption of the human heart, which was likely to show
itself more openly when Paul was no longer present to repress it; but it was
also fostered by false and insidious teachers, who took advantage of the
apostle's absence, not only to make a party for themselves, but to disparage
his personal character, and to unsettle his converts as to their religious
belief.
The usual fickleness of the Greeks, as well as the love of disputation
which marked their philosophy, and which caused them to divide themselves into
sects and schools, obtained for these false teachers a too ready hearing among
the Christians at Corinth; but though a large party in the place continued
attached to Paul, the attachment partook more of a sectarian spirit than became
brethren professing the same faith; and others of their body openly professed
themselves followers of different leaders, who had either been the means of
converting them, or had put themselves at the head of a party.
Danger of
Judaizing.
There is evidence that Paul's apostolical labours were impeded by false teachers in other places than Corinth; and the mischief
can, in some instances, clearly be traced to that mistaken zeal for the Law of
Moses, which had led the Christians of Jerusalem to insist upon the Gentile
converts being circumcised. It has been mentioned that even the decree of the
apostolical council did not satisfy the bigots of this party; and some of them
appear to have followed Paul in his journeys, and to have taken a pleasure in
unsettling the minds of his converts concerning the manner of justification.
This was strikingly the case with the imperfectly civilized inhabitants of
Galatia, who had lent themselves eagerly to some Judaizing preacher, and had
adopted the fatal error, that faith would not justify them, unless they
conformed to the Law of Moses.
The great mixture of Jews with the Gentile converts, in every place
where a church had been established, made it extremely probable that an error
of this kind would meet with many persons to embrace it. The Christians of
Greece, if we may judge from those of Macedonia and Achaia, do not appear to
have been in so much danger from this quarter: but the religion and the
philosophy of heathenism were themselves a sufficient snare to the new
converts; and much of the trouble and anxiety which were caused to Paul by the
misconduct of the Corinthians, may be traced to that spirit of pride and
ostentation which displayed itself in the Grecian schools.
There are also some traces of Gnosticism having found its way into
Corinth, though it flourished most luxuriantly in Asia Minor, and particularly
in Ephesus. Wherever the Jews abounded, the extravagances of Gnosticism were
also popular; which may be accounted for, not only by many Jews becoming
Gnostics, but by these philosophers having borrowed so largely from the
religious opinions of the Jews. It is possible that the name of Christ may have
been familiar to many persons, by the discourses and writings of the Gnostics,
before they had met with an apostle, or a disciple of the apostles, to instruct
them in the truths of Christianity.
Doubts about the lawfulness of marriage, abstinence from certain kinds
of food, and the questions connected with ascetic mortification of the body and
its appetites, may be traced in whole, or in part, to the doctrines of the
Gnostics. Paul was often called upon to give his opinion upon such points as
these; and we always find him drawing a broad line of distinction between
duties which are expressly defined in Scripture, and those matters which, being
in themselves indifferent, become right or wrong, according to circumstances,
or to the consequences which flow from them.
His leading principle was to impress upon his converts, that nothing was
essential but that which concerned the salvation of their souls; and that
nothing could promote their salvation which was not in some way or other
connected with faith in Christ. His own practice was in illustration of this
principle. If viewed at different times, or in different places, and with
reference to some particular points of practice, his conduct might have been
accounted inconsistent; but he was uniformly consistent in doing nothing and
omitting nothing which might lead men to think that outward works could justify
them. If a disciple abstained from any gratification, from a principle of
faith, he was allowed to follow his own conscience; but if the abstinence made
him uncharitable, or was viewed as being in itself meritorious, he was told
plainly that the Gospel is a law of liberty.
Gnosticism.
In all such questions we can perceive the sound practical sense and
kindly feeling of the apostle, as well as the instruction and illumination
which he had received from above. But in opposing the inroads of Gnosticism, he
had other points to consider than those which are in themselves indifferent,
and may be left to the conscience of each believer. The name of Christ held a
conspicuous place in the system of the Gnostics ; but there were parts of their
creed which destroyed the very foundations of the doctrine of the Gospel. Thus,
while they believed the body of Jesus to be a phantom, and denied the reality
of His crucifixion, they, in fact, denied their belief in the death of Christ,
and with it they gave up altogether the doctrine of the atonement. They
believed that Christ had come from heaven to reveal the knowledge of God; but
this was done by His appearing upon earth, and had no connection with His
death. Christ, said they, pointed out the way by which man might be reconciled
to God; but it was not by offering Himself as a sacrifice; and the
reconciliation was effected when a man was brought to entertain the true
knowledge of God.
So also the doctrine of the resurrection was explained away and reduced
to nothing by the figurative language of the Gnostics. The reunion of soul and
body at the general resurrection had always presented great difficulties to the
heathen. The notions even of their wisest philosophers had been so vague and
uncertain upon this subject that the apostles may be said to have introduced a
totally new doctrine when they taught that all who believed in Christ should
rise again to an eternity of happiness. Some had believed the soul to be mortal
as well as the body; others could not, or would not, understand how the body
after being reduced to dust could be restored to life. But the Gnostics, while
they professed to agree with the language held by the apostles, gave to it a
figurative interpretation, and said that each person rose again from the dead
when he became a Gnostic. The resurrection, therefore, was with themselves a
thing already past; and when they died they believed that they were removed
immediately from earth to heaven.
It is to be feared that many persons fell a prey to these false and
insidious teachers; and the apostles were naturally led to appoint some one person, as was the case with Titus in Crete, to
watch over the churches of a particular district. It was the same anxiety for
the souls of his flock which caused the apostle of the Gentiles to write so
many epistles, which, though filled with local and temporary allusions, and
often containing answers to specific questions, were intended also to furnish
instruction and consolation to believers of every country and every age. It
seems probable that the Epistles to Titus and the Galatians, as well as the
first Epistles to the Corinthians and to Timothy, were written during the
apostle's residence at Ephesus, or shortly after. When he wrote to the
Corinthians he had planned a journey which was to take him through the
continent of Greece to Corinth, from whence he meant to proceed to Jerusalem;
and though his departure from Ephesus happened sooner than he expected, he was
able to execute his design of visiting Greece.
It is plain that the Gospel made great progress in that part of Asia
while Paul was residing at Ephesus; nor is there any evidence of the government
having as yet interfered formally to oppose the success of his preaching. The
necessity for his leaving Ephesus was caused by a sudden, and apparently
unpremeditated, tumult, which was excited by the workmen whose livelihood
depended upon the national worship being kept up. These men felt the demand for
images and shrines becoming daily less; and it was plain that if Christianity
continued to advance, their own gains must speedily be destroyed. It was not
difficult, in a city like Ephesus, where the Temple of the Goddess Diana was
one of the wonders of the world, for these interested tradesmen to raise a cry
in defence of the popular superstition. The attempt was made, and succeeded.
The people took up the cause, as they vainly imagined, of the Goddess Diana;
and if the apostle had ventured among them during the heat of their excitement
he would probably have been torn in pieces.
There are traditions which speak of his being condemned to fight with
wild beasts in the Amphitheatre of Ephesus; and the notion may appear to be
countenanced by an expression of his own; but there is no certain evidence of
his having been exposed to such a punishment. At a later period, and perhaps in
the apostle's own days, the Christians were made the victims of such
barbarities; but if Paul had been treated in this manner, it must have been
with the consent, and by the order, of the civil magistrates; whereas we know
that some at least of the persons who presided over the shows and games in the
Amphitheatre were disposed to favour Paul. He might
also have pleaded his Roman citizenship, if his life had been endangered by
such a cruel sentence: all which makes it most probable that he was not exposed
to any special persecution, beyond what came upon all the Christians during the
continuance of the popular excitement.
St Paul again in Macedonia.
But though he thus escaped with his life, he felt it advisable to quit
the city; and, leaving Timothy with the same authority over the Christians
which he had committed to Titus in Crete, he set out for Macedonia. While he
was traversing the latter country he was met by Titus, who was not only able to
give him an account of his own flock but also brought him a favourable report of the Corinthian converts. The Macedonian churches were found in a
flourishing condition, having had the advantage for some years of the personal
superintendence of Luke and other zealous teachers. They were now called upon
to give a proof of their principles by contributing money for the relief of the
Christians in Judea, and the call was readily obeyed. When Paul left the
country he carried with him a large sum, which had been subscribed for this
purpose by the Macedonian Christians; and having prepared the Corinthians for a
visit by a second epistle, written to them from Macedonia, he arrived among
them before winter, and stayed with them three months.
The Corinthian converts, as already stated, had caused considerable
anxiety to the apostle, since the time of his first visit to their city. The
spirit of party was showing itself in an attachment to different preachers of
the Gospel; and the laxity of morals, which had always been peculiarly
prevalent in Corinth, had led to many irregularities. In his first epistle, he
had been obliged to use a tone of authority and rebuke; but the effect of it
was as successful, as it was seasonable. Though the false teachers had tried to
alienate the Corinthian Christians from their spiritual father, he found them
not only penitent for what had happened, but willing to obey all his directions
and commands. They followed the example of their Macedonian brethren in
subscribing for the Christians in Palestine; and though we know little beyond
the mere fact of Paul having passed the three winter months at Corinth, we may
safely pronounce this to have been one of the periods in his eventful life
which caused him the greatest consolation and satisfaction.
His zeal in the cause of the Gospel was not confined to watching over
the churches which had been planted by himself in Asia and Greece. He now
extended his views to the west of Europe, which, as far as we know, had not
hitherto been visited by any of the apostles. It is, however, plain that the
Gospel was spreading itself in that direction, as well as in the east. We have
already seen it carried into distant countries by the Jews who returned from
the festivals, or by those who had been driven from Jerusalem by persecution.
The first of these causes was likely to make Christianity known in Rome at a
very early period. When converts were made under these circumstances, they were
in danger of receiving the truth with a certain admixture of error; and such may
have been the case at Rome: but the favourable account which Paul received at Corinth concerning the state of the Roman
Christians, was such as to make him more than ever anxious to visit them in
person. He was still bent upon going to Jerusalem with the money which he had
collected: but when that mission was accomplished, he intended to go to Rome;
and one of the most interesting and valuable of his epistles was written to the
believers in that city, during his residence at Corinth.
As soon as the Winter was passed, he set out for Jerusalem; but, instead
of going by sea, he retraced his steps through Macedonia. He was joined at
Philippi by Luke; and though he was now attended by several companions, they do
not appear to have met with any molestation on their way. The journey was
performed principally by sea; and wherever they landed, they appear to have
found some of the inhabitants already converted to the Gospel. Five years had
elapsed since Paul's last visit to Jerusalem; and during that period, his unhappy
country had been exposed to sufferings of various kinds. Felix had contrived to
get rid of his partner in the office of procurator, and the Jews were in some
respects gainers, by having only one person to insult and pillage them; but
robbers and murderers infested the country in such numbers, that the government
was scarcely strong enough to suppress them; and impostors were now rising up
in every direction, who gave themselves out to be the Messiah, and deluded many
persons to follow them. It had been the policy of the Romans to change and
depose the high-priests, as best suited their own purpose, which opened a new
and constant source of intrigue among the candidates for that office; and
whoever was fortunate enough to obtain it, did not scruple to employ force to
get rid of a rival. At the time of Paul's arrival at Jerusalem, it was
difficult to say who was the legitimate high-priest. The station had been
filled by Ananias; but upon his going to Rome to answer some complaint, a
successor was appointed in the person of Jonathan, who had been high-priest
once before. Felix found it convenient to put Jonathan to death; and before a
new appointment was regularly made, Ananias returned from Rome, and resumed the
office of high-priest. It was just at this period that Paul arrived in Judea;
and though there were many things in the aspect of his country which could not
fail to give him pain, it is probable that the Jews had been drawn off from
persecuting the Christians, by being themselves harassed with so many internal
and external evils.
St Paul is attacked by the Jews.
It is certain that the Jews who had embraced the Gospel amounted at this
time to many thousands; but most, if not all of them, still adhered rigidly to
the Mosaic Law. Whether there were many who so entirely misunderstood the
Gospel, as to think that faith alone could not justify them without compliance
with the law, we are not able to decide; but there is reason to think that
there were very few Jews who did not feel bound, even after their conversion,
to observe the legal ceremonies. Many of these persons could not, or would not,
understand the principles which were preached and practised by Paul; and when his enemies gave out, that he taught the Jews, as well as the
Gentiles, to look upon the law as of no importance, the report was readily
believed, and raised a strong prejudice against him. He had contrived to reach
Jerusalem by the feast of Pentecost, at which time the city was always filled
by a great influx of foreign Jews. These men could not be ignorant of the
progress which the new opinions had made among their countrymen. Paul would
naturally be looked upon as the great leader of this defection from the faith
of their fathers; and thus the believing and unbelieving Jews united in viewing
him with feelings of suspicion, if not of hatred, which feelings were increased
by its being known that he was now travelling in company with Gentiles.
The conduct of Paul on this occasion enables us fully to understand his
views with respect to the obligation of observing the Law of Moses. He had
constantly told the Gentiles, that there was no necessity for their observing
any part of it; and he had been equally explicit to the Jews, in telling them
that the law was of no effect at al in procuring their
justification: if they continued to observe its ceremonies, they were to look
upon them merely as ceremonies: and, accordingly, when he was living with
Gentiles, who cared nothing for the law, he felt no scruples in disregarding
its precepts; but when he was living with Jews, whose consciences would have
been hurt by a neglect of the legal ceremonies, he observed all the customs in
which he had been brought up. His conduct on the present occasion was exactly
in conformity with his principle. Having consulted with James, who still
continued at Jerusalem as the resident head of the Christian Church, and who
perfectly agreed with Paul in his notions about the law, he took upon himself
the vow of a Nazarite, and appeared publicly in the
Temple, as a person who submitted implicitly to the Law of Moses. This
conformity, though it might have satisfied the Judaizing Christians, was not
sufficient to remove the prejudices which the unbelieving Jews had conceived
against the apostle. Seeing him upon one occasion in the Temple, they got
together a crowd of people, with the avowed intention of putting him to death.
Nor would they have failed in their purpose, if the commander of the Roman
garrison, who was always on the watch to prevent an insurrection, had not suddenly
come upon them with his troops, and rescued Paul out of their hands.
This interference of the military saved his life, but was the cause of
his sustaining a tedious imprisonment, first at Cesarea,
and afterwards at Rome. The Roman officer who had rescued him from the fury of
the people, having ascertained that he was a Roman citizen, sent him to
Caesarea, where Felix, the procurator, usually resided. Paul was here kept a
prisoner for two years, though his friends had free permission to visit him,
and his confinement in other respects was not rigorous. Felix himself admitted
him more than once into his presence, and listened to him while he explained
the doctrines of the Gospel: but no practical impression was produced upon his
wicked heart. He was well aware how unpopular he had made himself to the Jews
by his cruelty and rapacity, and though he was not base enough to deliver up
the apostle as a victim of their malice, he so far gratified them as to keep
him in prison during the two years of his continuing in his government.
St Paul imprisoned at Caesarea.
This was the first serious check which Paul had received in the course
of his evangelical ministry. Twenty-two years had now elapsed since his
conversion, eight of which had been employed in spreading the religion of
Christ through different heathen countries. During this period he had met with
constant opposition from the prejudices of the Jews, and had occasionally
suffered from the irreligion or superstition of the heathen. But still the
Gospel gained ground: the Grecian philosophers were too weak to stand against
him in argument; and the Roman government had not yet learnt to treat
Christianity as a crime. Even Felix, while he was unjustly detaining Paul as a
prisoner, was the unintentional cause of saving his life, and of reserving him
for future labours in the service of his heavenly
Master. For a time, however, the career of the great apostle was checked; and
it is now that we feel particularly, how much the history of the early Church
is confined to the personal history of Paul. We should wish to know what progress
the Gospel was making in other countries during the two years that Paul was
imprisoned at Caesarea. The other apostles had now been engaged for some years
in fulfilling their Master's command of spreading his religion throughout the
earth; but we know little of the scenes of their respective preaching. The
eastern parts of the world, rather than the western, appear to have been
traversed by them. Asia Minor and Greece, as we have already seen, received
their knowledge of the Gospel from Paul; to whose name we may add those of
Barnabas, Timothy, Titus, Silvanus, and Luke, as the persons who were most
active in evangelizing those countries.
Luke, as has been already stated, accompanied Paul to Jerusalem: but
there is no evidence that any of the apostle's companions were made to share in
his imprisonment. It is more probable, that they all preserved their liberty;
and though Paul's personal exertions were for the present restrained, he was under
no restrictions as to receiving visits from his friends; and even distant
churches might still enjoy the benefit of his advice and superintendence. It
has always been asserted, that Luke composed his Gospel, if not at the
dictation, at least under the direction of Paul; and no more probable period
can be assigned as the date of its composition, than the two years which were
passed by Paul at Caesarea. There is good reason to think that Luke was with
him during the whole of this period. He had first travelled in his company in
the year 46, and had only left him to take care of the Macedonian churches.
Like all the other persons employed in preaching the Gospel, he received the
miraculous assistance of the Holy Spirit; and as far as human instruction or example
could fit him for the work of an evangelist, he had the advantage of hearing
Paul explain those doctrines which had been revealed to himself from heaven.
When they arrived in Palestine, they found, as might naturally he
expected in that country, that several writings were in circulation which
professed to give an account of the life and actions of Jesus. Many of these
histories would probably be incorrect, even when written by friends; but the
open enemies of the Gospel would be likely to spread reports concerning its
first Founder which would be full of misrepresentations and falsehood. It would
therefore become necessary, for the sake of those who already believed, as well
as of those who were to be converted, that some faithful narrative should be
drawn up concerning the birth of Jesus, His miracles, His doctrine, and His
death. It has been said by some writers, that this was done within a few years
after the ascension of our Lord, and an early date has often been assigned to
the Gospel of Matthew: but it is perhaps safer to conclude, that none of the
four Gospels were written till about the period at which we are now arrived;
and the Gospel of Luke may be the first of those which have come down to us as
the works of inspired Evangelists.
|
||