PART SIX

We have seen the keystone of the Creed of the Belgic Confessor, and discovered that its nature is no other that the Argument that the Beast put before the court of the sons of god on the Omniscience of God and the Deeds of the sons of God as a single reality: “he did not commit treason against God when making Man to eat the Fruit of the Forbidden Tree; had God wanted Man not to eat He had but show up and stop him; He did not show up because He wanted Man to eat, ergo, to die. Man committed Sin by the Will of God, willingly”.

No one has to be ashamed for having been deceived by the same Beast that deceived that Man who God Himself formed with His own hands. Calvin, Luther, Henry the Eight and their mates in the Work of the Destruction of the Catholic Church, were convinced that the Devil was working on the other side. And, indeed, it was. The Beast could not dream with breaking Christianity in two without first opening a tremendous breach between the Clerical Hierarchy and the nations. The Beast had to corrupt the hierarchy in order to  move Cain and Abel back to the field of Civil War. To proceed the beast had on its side the subjection of the Catholic Church to the Italian families and powers, which made of the Church their own mine of gold; we see them from the beginning of the ninth century to the end of the fifteenth century, engaged to the last of their breath  in that work, massacring each other in their fight for the throne of Saint Peter. Disgusting, absolutely revolting.

Those same pontifical houses, to reign in the Hour of the Darkness, had to deny the principle of the Liberation of the Devil at the turn of the First Millennium, which they did, this way working for Death by preparing the ground for its prince. The Decree on the Liberation of the Devil had been written and was before everybody’s eyes, why did the Italian Pontifical houses deny the Word of God? Why did Saint Peter deny Christ? Without the work of those Italian pontifical houses the work of pushing to absolute corruption the Popedom it would have been impossible to open that breach between the Clerical Hierarchy and the nations. Thanks to those Italian Houses the Devil had but to crown its work with its puppet, the Renaissance’s Popes, and dress like a monk to repeat the Drama of the Fall.

Had the Clerical Hierarchy followed the Decreed of God, indeed Luther would have never done what he did, set Christianity on fire. He had been deceived by the Beast, as Adam was … with a big help from the part of the Popedom! The Son did not take away after Peter’s denials the Clerical Chiefdom from the Father’s Chosen, but those who took the Ring of the Wife of the Lord to push away men and nations from His Church, woe on all of them, the Lord will be their Judge, and if for the soul of one man many sins are washed, what will be God’s reward to those that with their  deeds made easier for the Devil to steal the souls of men and nations from the Lord?

God gave to Peter Divine Power in order to keep the Nations together. The Italian Popes and the Italian Cardinals used that Power to become “the Holy Devil”. Who would blame Luther and Calvin for having been blinded by the deeds of such Popes as the renaissance’s Popes? However, the Time of the Devil is at the end, and the Age of the Glory of the Freedom of the sons of God is dawning. God will judge everybody, our duty is to destroy the work of the Devil, our goal to do the Will of God, both deeds are the same and only thing.

15

 The Doctrine of Original Sin

We believe that by the disobedience of Adam original sin has been spread through the whole human race. It is a corruption of all nature--an inherited depravity which even infects small infants in their mother’s womb, and the root which produces in man every sort of sin. It is therefore so vile and enormous in God’s sight that it is enough to condemn the human race, and it is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism, seeing that sin constantly boils forth as though from a contaminated spring. Nevertheless, it is not imputed to God’s children for their condemnation but is forgiven by his grace and mercy--not to put them to sleep but so that the awareness of this corruption might often make believers groan as they long to be set free from the body of this death. Therefore we reject the error of the Pelagians who say that this sin is nothing else than a matter of imitation.

We see the hand of the Devil in this Article on this sentence : “Sin is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism”.

Excuse me!!!???

The Blood of the Immaculate Lamb of God could not and cannot root out from men and women the part that Death won on the soul of mankind by the Fall??

What for the Son of God came down from His Throne and up to the Cross?

The Grace is given as Redemption of the Pain merited by our sins; instead of death penalty the doors of Freedom get wide open; we get free, out of the prison where the Sin put us in; but out there the Wheels of Death keeps on turning, the Devil keeps on working, the effect of the Sin keeps pushing on the world along the Road to Hell, and spreading its global disease.

Baptism is unable to work the redemption of the soul?

And this is a Christian Man who speaks?

This man dare to call himself a Christian, a disciple of Christ, a son of God?

I doubt very much his talking in the name of the Lord.

Baptism is a personal Grace. It comes from God to every man. The Regeneration of the Nature of the soul is given, and with it Freedom, but the world keeps on turning. We have been freed from Prison, we know now the effect of Sin; what will do now, once we have been set free : get the rhythm of the world? isolate ourselves from the world?  live our lives as the Devil doesn’t exist?

Is it right to deny the Grace received in the Baptism in the name of those who fell in the old road which led them to the prison from which they were set free by the Grace coming with Baptism?

The choice is before our eyes. This World was founded on one wrong choice : War as Road to Civilization. Ever since every single Nation made of War the Core of its Economy and Power. The end of this career for World Supremacy is Global Self Destruction.

God did not invent this End. He saw this End coming again and again. Experience is the Source of His Wisdom, and Wisdom the Root of His Law. The choice once made, “we will abide by our own human law”, the End was at hand. However, Ignorance was on our side and we were given Redemption, and with it the Freedom coming with Grace from Baptism.

The Deeds committed before Baptism, the Blood of Christ washes out; but on those crimes committed after having been set free, every man and woman is responsible. The choice of getting back to the road that led man to prison is before that man once is back on the street. With Baptism comes the Grace, with the Grace the Freedom and with Freedom the Power of Faith : To be a son of God! What is saying the Confessor, that Baptism brings not this Power with it? that Faith has to be blamed for the World as it is? that the Grace is responsible for the existence of the world? that we receive Freedom without the Power to resist the temptations of this world?

“Therefore we reject the error of the Pelagians who say that this sin is nothing else than a matter of imitation”.

Really, and in what name? In the impossibility of Baptism to root out Sin from the Soul?

But the most dangerous part is the precedent paragraph: “Nevertheless, it is not imputed to God’s children for their condemnation but is forgiven by his grace and mercy--not to put them to sleep but so that the awareness of this corruption might often make believers groan as they long to be set free from the body of this death”.

Excuse me, the Christian has to remember this impossibility, this Imperfection of the Blood of the Lamb of God to root out Sin from the Human Soul, in order to excuse himself when the time comes for him to fall back on the road of Sin?

The Creed of the Confessor is based in the absolute Failure of the redemption of Christ to root out from the Human Soul the effect of the Fall of Man?

Right!

We read in the Book of God that the impossibility to do so, to root out Sin from the Human Soul, sealed the Decree of Destruction upon the Old Temple. Instead of one temple based on the failure of man to fight back Death by his own means, God gave us a New Temple, whose Foundation was the Power of God in the Soul of Man to do what the Old Temple could not, empower Man to fight back Death, Sin and the Devil, not only in himself but in his fellow human. This Power is the Cradle of Christian Freedom.

Baptism washed out all our Sins, and at the same time empower us to never give way in before the Temptations of this World, but with Freedom comes the Choice : The choice of falling back in the old road leading to prison.

Baptism does not convert man to God to make of man an automat incapable of making choices. The Freedom of the Image of the Son of God’s is the higher Freedom a man can attained. We come out from Prison, by Baptism, Pure and New, to walk on a new road, to get back in the street, to move like a son of God, never to listen the Devil, never to feel Temptation, rocks on two legs, enemies of Death to the bones, the Regeneration of the Foundation of Civilization as goal.

Only one who uses the blood of Christ to wash the crimes he will commit in the future, and to which he gives himself up, completely, can say that “Sin is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism”.

How can Baptism abolish Sin in those who are not baptized?

But if you have been baptized and still you are slave of the power of Death, which is Sin, you do renegade of Christ, to whom you accuse of being not the Lamb of God whose Divine Blood roots out Sin from the soul of Man. This on one hand.

On the other, if you preach that the Blood of Christ is a washing machine at your service to wash every sin you commit after Baptism, your words comes not from God but from the Devil.

Make your choice!

16

 The Doctrine of Election

We believe that--all Adam’s descendants having thus fallen into perdition and ruin by the sin of the first man--God showed himself to be as he is: merciful and just. He is merciful in withdrawing and saving from this perdition those whom he, in his eternal and unchangeable counsel, has elected and chosen in Jesus Christ our Lord by his pure goodness, without any consideration of their works. He is just in leaving the others in their ruin and fall into which they plunged themselves.

We understand, they are the New Chosen, from eternity chosen to salvation, and we are the left overs, born to ruin and hell. Hey man, Halleluiah, don’t you worry, commit as many sin as you can, don’t worry, you can even fuck the mother of God, because the Precious Blood of Christ washes out every Sin. Yeah!

One thing is not clear, however; why the precious blood of Christ does not washes out the Sin of the Devil? Will it be because the Justice of that Just God of the Confessors springs out not from Truth but from the caprice of Power?

God is All-Powerful, right?

He can do whatever to whoever, when and how He fancies, right?

As a matter of fact, according to this Justice of the “Just and Hidden God” of the Reformation, which takes from Islam the conception of the Justice of God as Power, God may be saving you to get you higher, and then drop you to make fall harder, why not?

Were God’s Justice based in Might and not in Right, why not?

Might being all about with the Justice of that “Just God” who from eternity choose some to glory and other to ruin, the Creation a circus of monsters, God the head of them, who assure you that sometime in the Eternity God will get not tired of you?

It looks like the Kingdom of God is the Kingdom of Boredom and He needs to play Chess; you here, you there, all right let’s begin. Don’t eat; now, you, tell him to eat. War is on. Good. What’s next. O yes,  a temple, then put it down, a New Temple, instead of money to wash their crimes give them Christ’s Blood. Good. Now let’s put down the New Temple and brings many in its stead. Good, good, what’s next?

Let’s work paragraph by paragraph :

“We believe that--all Adam’s descendants having thus fallen into perdition and ruin by the sin of the first man--God showed himself to be as he is: merciful and just”.

The Catholic Faith cannot be better quoted. The Reformers were good copyists. And then they retorted their copy to make them brand new. See this: Mercy is based on Might or on Right?  Because if on Might indeed God directed the entire Scene of the Fall to show Himself Merciful; but if this was so, he could not be Just.

Under no premise can be Just the mercy of an assassin who stab the victim and then take him to the hospital. Only the assassin can call Just that mercy. And only an assassin can call that justice : “merciful”.

What they are talking about then the Belgic Confessors?

In the mouth of the Old Jews who killed their Messiah, and in the Islamic preachers whose conception of God’s Justice is based in Might, not in Right, this paragraph would sound absolutely holy. In the ear of a son  of God, in whose soul the Justice of God is based on Right, nor in Might, God’s Might being the defender of the Right, this paragraph is satanic, he repeats the Argument of the Devil, used in his own defense before the court of the sons of God.

If God shows mercy on those who he predestine to glory, and shows His wrath on those who He predestine to ruin, how can be accused Satan of being the Cause of the Perdition of Mankind once God had him predestined to do what he did?

“Who can fight back the Power of God? He creates the board, he set up the pawns, He calls on Action. Where is the deal? What is His Justice? He condemns those who were create for? His Justice is a joke!”.

This, in fact, is the natural, satanic speech kindled by a Justice founded on Might.

Justice founded on Right is the Source of the Blood of Christ.

“God had predestined no one to Ruin. He had created every one to enjoy the glory of the Freedom of a son of God. With this Freedom comes the Power to choose the Path of the Law or the Path of Corruption. With His Own Example and Life the First Born Son of God leads the Road to Freedom. There is no Board, there are no pawns. Creation of Life comes with the Right of the sons of God : Right to Freedom, Peace, Truth, Justice, Happiness, Creativity, Brotherhood, Friendship, Citizenship. The Might of God backs up the Right of the sons of God : Right to be misused not. Right to be protected and defended. Right to be told the Truth. Right to know everything. This is the Right coming with the Creation of Life; it was to God to take it or to leave it. He took it in His hand the Power of Creation of Life to His Image because He loved that Right.

God doesn’t need to show Himself merciful and just, the existence of Right implies Mercy and Justice. The Devil brought this Need into his argument before the Court of the sons of God in order to justify his crime against Heaven and Earth. The Mercy and Justice of God needs no Fall to be seen. The existence of the Right of the sons of God to Freedom at the Image of the Son of God is the Living Expression of God’s Mercy and Justice.

“He is merciful in withdrawing and saving from this perdition those whom he, in his eternal and unchangeable counsel, has elected and chosen in Jesus Christ our Lord by his pure goodness, without any consideration of their works”.

Always speaking about themselves, of course. They have been saved from eternity, why bother in entering into the vastness and deepness of the Wisdom of God? Who needs to understand everything, anyway?

Saved, ay, ay, ay!

And when you fall, washed your soul on the precious blood of Christ, that washing machine never breaks!

Once you have been chosen by God’s “eternal unchangeable counsel” no matter the genocides you may commit, hey man, you are saved, Halleluiah!

Let’s set Europe on fire, it’s cold in here! Thirty Years’ War! That was a real fire! So what, why not few world wars? After all God cannot change His “eternal and unchangeable” counsel, could He?

What a joke! Creation means continual activity, action on the run, presence in the Present, direction on the Future,  Work.

Predestination means Magic, Wizardry, no Present, no Past, no Future, no Contact with Reality. Eternity, where is that? God directs the full History of the Cosmos … no Work needed, no need of Wisdom,  just Magic, from Eternity the Eternity comes. All right!

Where is the Passion of the Creator for His Creation, the Love of the Artist for His Art, the Pleasure of the Perfectionist who takes his work to the higher pitch?

Like their Anglican Brothers the Belgic Confessors sees in God nothing but an Idol made of letters whose mission is to give them gold and empire. Ergo :

“He is just in leaving the others in their ruin and fall into which they plunged themselves”. Of course, there is no wisdom for him who does not want to see wisdom, there is no Right but Might for those who aspire to Might and have in Right the restraint of their might.

The God who is Love, where is He?

These guys took from the Bible what fit to their mind, and the rest were word of the Devil. God is Love was a sentence by the Antichrist, the Catholic Church, written. God is Love? God is Might! the Almighty, isn’t He? How can we conceal that God who is Catholic Love with that God who is Protestant Justice?

You to hell, you to heaven, you to hell too…

Why?

Why? Because am the Almighty and I have more bollocks than you, understood?

Yes, sir.

Can I wash my sin in your son’s blood?

No!

Why?

Again. Because you are going to hell, and only my chosen ones have the right to use my Christ’s Blood as their washing machine. You get it? Now, keep on going, hell is waiting.

What a wonderful world the world of the Chosen from the eternity by the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God! No hypocrisy can surpass their hypocrisy! At least we know this, that in this are we need no challenge the disciples of the reformed churches, they are the champions of Hypocrisy!

17

The Recovery of Fallen Man

We believe that our good God, by his marvelous wisdom and goodness, seeing that man had plunged himself in this manner into both physical and spiritual death and made himself completely miserable, set out to find him, though man, trembling all over, was fleeing from him. And he comforted him, promising to give him his Son, born of a woman, to crush the head of the serpent, and to make him blessed.

And they believed too, though following the “eternal and unchangeable counsel of their  hidden God” they hid this part of their belief, that before they came into town no man or nation had ever heard this good news.

Of course not, from the Eternity their Hidden God had disposed the entire Creation to serve them, make them rich, give them empire, as the payment against their preaching to the world this good news : the Blood of Christ is a washing machine counting on which you may sin as much as you can’t get rid of sinning.

Heil Luther!

What a wonderful Article, such an infinite wisdom, and such an eternal good news! But I got to ask : Was it not exactly that good news the one that the Popes and their Italian Cardinals were using ever since  they turned Christ’s Blood into their own, private washing machine?

Right, now I understand, what Luther was saying was that he wanted that washing machine to be the Universal Washing Machine, as it was it in the days of the primitive church, band the roman church had monopolized to herself, the bitch!

And there he was, the chosen from Eternity, to rescue the Washing Machine from the palace of the Vatican!

Ay, ay, ay!

18

The Incarnation

So then we confess that God fulfilled the promise which he had made to the early fathers by the mouth of his holy prophets when he sent his only and eternal Son into the world at the time set by him. The Son took the “form of a servant” and was made in the “likeness of man, truly assuming a real human nature, with all its weaknesses, except for sin”; being conceived in the womb of the blessed virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit, without male participation. And he not only assumed human nature as far as the body is concerned but also a real human soul, in order that he might be a real human being. For since the soul had been lost as well as the body he had to assume them both to save them both together. Therefore we confess, against the heresy of the Anabaptists who deny that Christ assumed human flesh from his mother, that he “shared the very flesh and blood of children”; that he is “fruit of the loins of David”; according to the flesh; “born of the seed of David” according to the flesh; “fruit of the womb of the virgin Mary”; “born of a woman”; “the seed of David”; “a shoot from the root of Jesse”; “the offspring of Judah”, having descended from the Jews according to the flesh; “from the seed of Abraham”-- for he “assumed Abraham’s seed” and was “made like his brothers except for sin.”

In this way he is truly our Immanuel--that is: “God with us”.

I mean, this all about the Incarnation : Jesus is “God with us” because He was the son of David? And if, he was not son of David, Jesus was no God?

But let’s deal with a paragraph after another.

“So then we confess that God fulfilled the promise which he had made to the early fathers by the mouth of his holy prophets when he sent his only and eternal Son into the world at the time set by him”.

First thing is to see what’s new in this confession. When one man separates from another because creed the cause got to be found in the nature of the confession. To break with someone who signs absolutely the same words there got to be a different meaning in the words by both adopted as creed. The Confessors call Antichristian the Catholicism while both sign this same confession. Both Protestants and Catholics said the same. The Catholics were saying this during One Thousand and Five hundred years and the Protestants  were saying it since just then. Why to take from the Antichristian Catholic the same confession? If I commit a crime I am an criminal; if you commit a crime, you’re a criminal too. In this case this logic doesn’t work. The Catholics were antichrist for signing these words and the Protestants were not antichrist for signing the same words. How so?

The Devil, according to the Creed in here displayed, was a murderer because he murdered a man, and he murdered because from the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God he was predestined to commit that murder; however if a chosen by that “eternal and unchangeable counsel of God” comes and do the same, once he has been chosen the murder makes not a murderer of him, because the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God cannot be changed; no matter what the chosen does the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God overrule the nature of the deed.. Right?

Ay, ay, ay!

God turned into a kind of miserable joke!

Two people sign the same confession, and upon one, the Protestant Confessor, He rains on Paradise, and upon the other, the Catholic Confessor, he rains on Hell! Can this be?

Nay, nay, nay!

At least that the interpretation of the confession be as many as the confessors.

The Interpretation of the Catholic Confessor is well known to the lovers of the sciences of History and Philosophy : Jesus Christ is the Word of God made Flesh and Blood. No Word of God said and read in His Book fell on the ground; every one of them came together to form the muscles, the nerves, the brain and the heart of Christ Jesus. He was the Avenger of the Blood of Adam with the Axe and the Hammer in His hands to chop off the head of the Old Snake. He was the Redeemer in whose Blood all the sins of the World was to be forgiven. And so on and so forth. The Old Testament was written for Him, and through its books God was talking to His Son, spreading before His eyes the Road to the Future of Heaven and Earth. Then came the fools, thinking that the Ancient Testament refers to them, interpreting the Ancient Testament as word of God to them. Were of this foolish kind the Protestant Confessors?

Let’s find it out.

“The Son took the “form of a servant” and was made in the “likeness of man, truly assuming a real human nature, with all its weaknesses, except for sin”; being conceived in the womb of the blessed virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit, without male participation”.

Two Confessors, same confession, one call antichristian to the other, and the chosen takes as his the confession of the antichrist catholic. If the Catholic be the antichrist why to take his confession?

However, the chosen is denying the Catholic Confession. The Son did not take the form of a servant, the Son took the form of the Lord. At least, of course, that the “servants” of God can say to the dead, “get up”, and to the blind, “see”, and to the deaf, “hear,” and to the numb, “speak”, and to the lame, “run”, and to the winds, “get calm”, and so on and so forth.

Can the servants of God do that?

Wow boy, then we have to burn them all, because having the power to do all : they reserve for themselves the Power of the Lord.

Tell me boy, can do they that? How then, the Son came to take the form of a servant? He came as Lord to take back what he was stolen from Him, Mankind. This on one hand.

On the other hand, He was not made “in the likeness of a man”, Man was made to His Likeness.

God gave us the Original, the Source of the Image to which Man was made. The Son had not to assume a Nature strange to Himself, because His Nature is the Original Source of the Image to which the Man was created.

It is not for the Creator to assume the Nature of the Creature, but for the Creature to assume the Nature of his Creator. Man was made at the Image of the son of God, blameless, immaculate, perfect in His love for God, Truth, Peace and Justice. The Lord came to show us the Man, the Creature of God as the Creator conceived Man in the Womb of His Wisdom and Omniscience. That Man had no “weaknesses”. Ergo, the Son took no weaknesses, no sin, because He has no weaknesses, no sin, and He was to the Image and Likeness of He that God created us.

In this first part of the paragraph the Protestant separates from the Catholic Confessor in order to put down the glory of Jesus Christ, the Lord, whose Glory, according to them, can be taken away from Him depending on the nature of His action. Jesus is the Lord, and the Lord is God, how could Jesus Christ be other that the One He was, the One He is?

He came as Lord, and we saw the Lord “being conceived in the womb of the blessed virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit, without male participation”. (Quoted from the Catholic Church Confession, no need to go further)

Then: “And he not only assumed human nature as far as the body is concerned but also a real human soul, in order that he might be a real human being”. The Protestant Confessor insists in his turning upside down the Bible. The body is the temple where the soul abides. This soul being the Image and Likeness of the Son of God, and that Image having being broken by the Fall, the Son, the Original Source of the Broken Image, came to the Temple to live in, and with His Life to restore the Image to its original source, rescuing from the grave the soul of mankind.

A “real human being” is a son of God. Did the Son of God, to whose Image and Likeness we all have been created, did the Son be in the need to take the Image and likeness of Himself? It is for us to become to His Image, and for this reason he came into the Temple of the Body, to show us the original of our soul, and with it to turn our bodies into abodes of sons of God.

“For since the soul had been lost as well as the body he had to assume them both to save them both together”.

It is another way to put it. Let’s them give this credit.

Therefore we confess, against the heresy of the Anabaptists who deny that Christ assumed human flesh from his mother, that he “shared the very flesh and blood of children”; that he is “fruit of the loins of David”; according to the flesh; “born of the seed of David” according to the flesh; “fruit of the womb of the virgin Mary”; “born of a woman”; “the seed of David”; “a shoot from the root of Jesse”; “the offspring of Judah”, having descended from the Jews according to the flesh; “from the seed of Abraham”-- for he “assumed Abraham’s seed” and was “made like his brothers except for sin.”

As this is but just a repetition from the “antichristian” Catholic Confession we pass to the next shot.

In this way he is truly our Immanuel--that is: “God with us”.

This conclusion is taken from the Catholic Creed, ergo, antichristian. And because it, the Confessors become antichristians too.