|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|||
FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH ON THE 39 ARTICLES
CHAPTER TWENTY FOUR
Of speaking in the
Congregation in such a tongue as the people understand.
It is a thing plainly repugnant to the Word of
God, and the custom of the Primitive Church to have Public Prayer in the
Church, or to minister the Sacraments in a tongue not understood of the people.
Repugnant to God is to massacre nations,
repugnant to God is to assist to the massacre of a nation and doing nothing to
stop the murderer. Repugnant to God is taking from the poor to giving to the
rich, bail-out they call it; repugnant to God is to destroy the Unity of the
Church, repugnant to God is to deny the Kingship of Jesus Christ and take a man
as king. Repugnant to God is to deny the Headship of Christ Jesus as the head
of the Church.
Repugnant to God is speaking in Latin?
Then came the English and God fell in love
with the English Language and dammed to hell the Languages of the Mediterranean
Nations. From this we understand the absolute impotence of the English folk to
speak French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, and so on. These are languages repugnant
to God, aren’t they? These are languages of the Devil!
Repugnant to the customs of the Primitive
Church?
Of course, they spoke no English, man! They
were nuts, more than that, they were PIGS!
Was not Latin the International Language of
the Day as much as the English is the International Language of the Day?
Does this Article means that the Priest
speaking Latin to the Spanish Nation before the Divine Nation of the Teutons
came around, that priest was repugnant to God because he spoke Latin but not Spanish?
Can we conclude from this Article that the
Apostleship was repugnant to God, not so much because those “repugnant” fellows
could not speak the Language of the English Church, but because they addressed
to the Nations in Latin?, the bastards!
No wonder in the repugnant instinct of the
Nations born from the Reformation toward the Mediterranean Languages.
Theirs are the languages of God. Which takes
us to this point : And to the Native Americans to preach them in English, that
was not repugnant to God? Of course, if in Spanish, oh yeah, that was repugnant
to God.
We see that as the Creed goes on the Taliban
Fundamentalist Soul in the Subscribers come to surface more and more evidently.
Now they can say even what is repugnant to God. A thing very estrange indeed
for a “God who has no passion”, as the first article did state in the face of
the history and the world.
The stupidity in the declaration is so
enormous than only a perfect stupid could waste his time in demolishing a statement made for the control
of the souls of a nation subjected to a reign of terror with the blessing of
the Anglican Church. It is not the preaching which is made in Latin, but the
formulas natural to the Cult, understood by all folks by the continuity of the
use.
The Pater Noster in
Latin or in Hungarian, so what? When did the English Priest preached to the
common in Latin, you fools!? But when it comes to the sacra formula of the
Mass, so what?
The Pater Noster in
Latin is repugnant to God? No one is so fool as to pray the Pater Noster in Latin in the intimacy of his room, or alone in
the Temple. Is there such a fool? The English can’t help thinking of himself as
the most clever creature of the planet, as a matter of fact his Language is the
Language of God.
What would the English says of this Article
if the English were the Latin of the day, would they abolish this Article as
repugnant to God?
|
|||||
|
 |
 |
 |
